Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Date2015
Year2015
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • Wilson v State of Victoria
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 20 d1 Fevereiro d1 2023
    ...and Border Protection [2016] HCA 1; (2016) 257 CLR 42 Plaintiff M83A/2019 v Morrison (No 2) [2020] FCA 1198 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; (2015) 228 FCR 148 Re Finlayson; Ex parte Finlayson (1997) 72 ALJR 73 Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921) 29 CLR 257 Spencer v Commonwe......
  • Mulley v Hayes
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 13 d1 Setembro d1 2021
    ...537; (2020) 277 FCR 658 PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore PTE Ltd [2015] HCA 36; (2015) 258 CLR 1 Qantas Airways Limited v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; (2015) 228 FCR 148 R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAF......
  • Page v Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 d5 Abril d5 2020
    ...[2000] FCA 1572; 104 FCR 564 Parkes Shires Council v South West Helicopters Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 14; 367 ALR 1 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; 228 FCR 148 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC 156; 254 FCR 1 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally [1999] HCA 27; 198 CLR 511 Rivera v Australian Broadc......
  • Quach v Marks (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 d2 Agosto d2 2021
    ...Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427 Page v Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 537; (2020) 277 FCR 658 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; (2015) 228 FCR 148 Quach v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency [2021] FCA 313 Quach v Marks [2021] FCA 335 Quach v New South......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • CATS, COURTS AND THE CONSTITUTION: THE PLACE OF SUPER-TRIBUNALS IN THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 3, April 2020
    • 1 d3 Abril d3 2020
    ...(n 11) 432 [20] (Kiefel CJ, Bell and Keane JJ), quoting Re Wakim (n 30) 574 [110] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig (2015) 228 FCR 148, 163 [64] (Perry J) ('Lustig'), quoting K-Generation (n 20) 529 [88] (French CJ). As McHugh J observed in Fardon (n 20) 598 It is a serious......