Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Date2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Quach v Marks (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 Agosto 2021
    ...Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427 Page v Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 537; (2020) 277 FCR 658 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; (2015) 228 FCR 148 Quach v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency [2021] FCA 313 Quach v Marks [2021] FCA 335 Quach v New South......
  • Page v Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 Abril 2020
    ...[2000] FCA 1572; 104 FCR 564 Parkes Shires Council v South West Helicopters Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 14; 367 ALR 1 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; 228 FCR 148 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC 156; 254 FCR 1 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally [1999] HCA 27; 198 CLR 511 Rivera v Australian Broadc......
  • Mulley v Hayes
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 13 Septiembre 2021
    ...whether the claim was advanced for an improper purpose to fabricate jurisdiction. As Perry J explained in Qantas Airways Limited v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; (2015) 228 FCR 148 (at 169 [88]): The question, therefore, of whether a claim is tenable will be relevant to that question but not determ......
  • Law v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 Diciembre 2020
    ...tribunal finds jurisdiction to be absent, it has no further power to act save possibly with regard to costs: Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig [2015] FCA 253; 228 FCR 148 at [109] per Perry J; Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth [2003] FCAFC 83; 128 FCR 507 at [11] per Black CJ ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • CATS, COURTS AND THE CONSTITUTION: THE PLACE OF SUPER-TRIBUNALS IN THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 Nbr. 3, April 2020
    • 1 Abril 2020
    ...(n 11) 432 [20] (Kiefel CJ, Bell and Keane JJ), quoting Re Wakim (n 30) 574 [110] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig (2015) 228 FCR 148, 163 [64] (Perry J) ('Lustig'), quoting K-Generation (n 20) 529 [88] (French CJ). As McHugh J observed in Fardon (n 20) 598 It is a serious......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT