QSuper Board v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Limited

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date09 April 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 55
Date09 April 2020
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


QSuper Board v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Limited [2020] FCAFC 55


File number:

QUD 535 of 2019



Judges:

MOSHINSKY, BROMWICH AND DERRINGTON JJ



Date of judgment:

9 April 2020



Catchwords:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Judicial power of the Commonwealth – Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) given powers to determine superannuation complaints – AFCA determined that superannuation trustee’s decision not to refund money to member operated unreasonably or unfairly in its operation in relation to that member – decision alleged to be or to involve an impermissible exercise of judicial power because it was “in effect” a determination of existing rights of the parties in relation to the operation of s 1017B of the Corporations Act – AFCA’s determination did not involve any determination of rights under s 1017B – entitlement of non-judicial body to determine rights of parties as a step “along the way” to a non-judicial decision discussed – ability of non-judicial body to determine rights of parties where other aspects of judicial power not present – application dismissed



Legislation:

Constitution ss 71, 75(v)

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43, 44, 44A

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 911A, 912A, 1017B, 1022B, 1022C, 1050, 1051, 1052E, 1055, 1055A, 1055B, 1057, 1057A

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25

Insurance and Superannuation Commissioner Act 1987 (Cth)

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 10, 18, 19, 31, 101, 298

Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) s 37

Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Consumers First – Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority) Act 2018 (Cth)

Superannuation (State Public Sector) Act 1990 (Qld) ss 3, 4, 12

Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) reg 7.6.01(1)(a)

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No 5) (Cth) reg 13.17B

Superannuation (State Public Sector) Deed 1990 (Qld)

Superannuation (State Public Sector) (Scheme Membership) Amendment of Deed Regulation 2017 (Qld)



Cases cited:

Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; 197 CLR 510

Albarran v Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board [2007] HCA 23; 231 CLR 350

Attorney-General (Cth) v Alinta Limited [2008] HCA 2; 233 CLR 542

Attorney-General (Cth) v Breckler [1999] HCA 28; 197 CLR 83

Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 7; 255 CLR 352

Australian Communications Authority v Viper Communications Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 637; 110 FCR 380

Australian Football League v Carlton Football Club Ltd [1998] 2 VR 546

Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245

Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; 252 FCR 352

Dundee General Hospitals Board of Management v Walker [1952] 1 All ER 896

Fastbet Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 5) [2019] FCA 2073

Gisborne v Gisborne (1877) 2 App Cas 300

Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Limited v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330

Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 16

Luton v Lessels [2002] HCA 13; 210 CLR 333

Mickovski v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd [2012] VSCA 185; 36 VR 456

Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16; 309 ALR 67

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; 197 CLR 611

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; 206 CLR 323

Palmer v Ayres [2017] HCA 5; 259 CLR 478

Perpetual Trustees Australia Ltd v Wallace [2007] FCA 527

Precision Data Holdings Ltd v Wills (1991) 173 CLR 167

R v Davison (1954) 90 CLR 353

R v Gallagher; Ex parte Aberdare Collieries Pty Ltd (1963) 37 ALJR 40

R v Quinn; Ex parte Consolidated Foods Corporation (1977) 138 CLR 1

R v Trade Practices Tribunal; Ex parte Tasmanian Breweries Pty Ltd (1970) 123 CLR 361

Re Cram; Ex parte Newcastle Wallsend Coal Co Pty Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 140

Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd v Crocker [2001] FCA 1330; 48 ATR 359

Rola Company (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1944) 69 CLR 185

Sue v Hill [1999] HCA 30; 199 CLR 462

TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongsham) Co Ltd v Judges of Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5; 251 CLR 533

Waterside Workers’ Federation of Australia v JW Alexander Ltd (1918) 25 CLR 434

White v Director of Military Prosecutions [2007] HCA 29; 231 CLR 570

Wilkinson v Clerical Administrative and Related Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd (1998) 79 FCR 469



Date of hearing:

13 February 2020



Registry:

Queensland



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

207



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr A Sullivan QC



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Thomson Geer



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr M Wise QC with Mr A Solomon Bridge



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Arslan Lawyers



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

The Second Respondent did not appear



Counsel for the Intervener:

Mr G del Villar QC with Ms K McGree



Solicitor for the Intervener:

Australian Government Solicitor



ORDERS


QUD 535 of 2019

BETWEEN:

QSUPER BOARD

Applicant


AND:

AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY LIMITED

First Respondent


TOMMY LAM

Second Respondent



JUDGES:

MOSHINSKY, BROMWICH AND DERRINGTON JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

9 APRIL 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. The applicant have leave to amend the amended notice of appeal by including the additional ground of appeal.

2. The applicant is to file and serve the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • Wan v BT Funds Management Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 March 2022
    ...HCA 9; 199 CLR 343 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 QSuper Board v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Ltd [2020] FCAFC 55; 276 FCR 97 Rushton v Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (No 3) [2021] FCA 358 Telstra Super Pty Ltd v Flegeltaub [2000] VSCA 180; 2 VR 27......
  • Tratter v Aware Super
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 19 May 2023
    ...Association of Australasia Ltd v Campbell [2000] FCA 852; 99 FCR 562 QSuper Board v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Limited [2020] FCAFC 55; 276 FCR 97 Pennington v Norris [1956] HCA 26; 96 CLR 10 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; 59 ALR 529 Reeves v Nul......
  • MetLife Insurance Limited v Australian Financial Complaints Authority
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 27 January 2022
    ...Pty Limited v Glencore Coal Assets Australia Pty Ltd [2021] HCA 39 QSuper Board v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Limited [2020] FCAFC 55; (2020) 276 FCR 97 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 R v Khazaal [2012] HCA 26; (2012) 246 CLR 601 Rine......
  • Sharma v H.E.S.T. Australia Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 13 May 2022
    ...Platt [1900] 1 Ch 616 Montclair v MetLife Insurance Ltd [2015] VSC 306 QSuper Board v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Limited (2020) 276 FCR 97; [2020] FCAFC 55 R v Connell; Ex parte The Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407 Rushton v Commonwealth Superannuation Corpora......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries