R v Bell; ex parte Lees

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1980-0805 HCA D,[1980] HCA 26
Date1980
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
48 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Lawyers, confidentiality and whistleblowing: lessons from the McCabe tobacco litigation.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 Nbr. 3, April - April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...the disclosure of information (orally or in writing). (74) See especially R v Cox (1884) 14 QBD 153. (75) R v Bell; Ex parte Lees (1980) 146 CLR 141, 156 (Stephen (76) British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Gordon [2009] VSC 619 (24 December 2009) [158] (Kaye J), quoting A-G (NT) v Kearne......
  • The influence of Professor J.H. Wigmore on evidence law in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The Nbr. 19-1, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...1806.56. (1942) AC 726 at 781.57. Alister, above n. 51 at [11], citing People v Wells (1893) 34 P. 1078 at 1079.58. Ibid. at [17].59. (1980) 146 CLR 141. 40 Wilson 41 As an illustration of Wigmore’s standing in the eyes of the High Court, Stephen J held that the of the development of legal ......
  • ETHICS IN FAMILY LAW – BEYOND LEGAL PRINCIPLES AND INTO VALUE JUDGMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal Nbr. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...Taxation(1999) 201 CLR 49. 35 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Pt 3.10. 36 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 125. 37 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 128. 38 (1980) 30 ALR 489. 39 R v Bell, ex parte Lees (1980) 30 ALR 489 at 494. 40Hutchings v Clarke(1993) FLC ¶92–373 at 79,876. 41 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131(1)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT