R v Board of Appeal; ex parte Kay

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1916-1023 HCA B,[1916] HCA 63
Year1916
Date1916
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Krstic v Australian Telecommunications Commission
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Haritou v Skourdoumbis
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Qaah of 2004
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 November 2006
    ...Pty Ltd [1987] VR 54; R v King; Ex parte Westfield Corporation(Victoria) Ltd (1981) 64 LGRA 28. 143 R v Board of Appeal ; Ex parte Kay (1916) 22 CLR 183; McNab v Auburn Soccer Sports Club Ltd [1975] 1 NSWLR 54 at 144 The Act, s 501E. 145 (1999) 197 CLR 510 . 146 Abebe v The Commonwealth (......
  • Kok Seng Chong v Bukit Turf Club and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 9 December 1992
    ... ... The plaintiff also filed an ex parte summons-in-chambers on 27 August 1992 seeking an interim injunction (which he duly obtained on the ... The defendants now appeal against my decision. When the plaintiff applied for his ex parte injunction, he had three ... The Board went on to say (per Lord Jenkins at pp 235-236): ... Their Lordships are, therefore, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT