R v Duncan; ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1983] HCA 29,1983-0906 HCA A
Year1983
Date1983
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • R v Hughes
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 Mayo 2000
    ...the federal law taking it required support by an available head of power. 35 To adapt what was said by Deane J inR v Duncan; Ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd20, what is involved here is more than an indication by the Commonwealth Parliament of ‘a negative intention not to cover th......
  • Re Cram;ex parte Nsw Colliery Proprietors' Association Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Pape v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 Julio 2009
    ...and Dawson JJ. 185 (2000) 202 CLR 535 at 554–555 [38]; [2000] HCA 22. 186 R v Duncan; Ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1983) 158 CLR 535 ; [1983] HCA 29. 187 (1983) 158 CLR 535 at 560. 188 Davis v The Commonwealth (1988) 166 CLR 79 at 103 –104 per Wilson and Dawson JJ. 189 As no......
  • Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • The Limits and Use of Executive Power by Government
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 Septiembre 2003
    ...53 See above n 47 and accompanying text. 54 R v Duncan; Ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1983) 158 CLR 535, 560, apparently adopted in R v Hughes (2000) 202 CLR 535, 554–5 [38] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ). 55 AAP (1975) 134 CLR 338, 406. 56 Ibid 4......
  • Heresy in the High Court? Federalism as a Constraint on Commonwealth Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-1, March 2013
    • 1 Marzo 2013
    ...554–5 [38] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ), quoting R v Duncan; Ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1983) 158 CLR 535, 560 (Mason J). 90 Federal Law Review Volume 41 ____________________________________________________________________________________ of ......
  • Fertile Ground for Federalism? Internal Security, the States and Section 119 of the Constitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 Junio 2015
    ...378–9 (Gibbs J), 396–8, 400–1 (Mason J), 406 (Jacobs J) ('the AAP Case'); R v Duncan; Ex parte Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1983) 158 CLR 535, 560 (Mason J) ('Duncan'); Davis v Commonwealth (1988) 166 CLR 79, 93 (Mason CJ, Deane and Gaudron JJ), 103–4 (Wilson and Dawson JJ) ('Davis');......
  • SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2013 —“THE RULE OF LAW AS A MANY COLOURED DREAM COAT”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 Diciembre 2014
    ...per Brennan J. 46Victoria v Commonwealth(1975) 134 CLR 338 at 397, per Mason J; R v Duncan, ex parte Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd(1983) 158 CLR 535 at 560, per Mason J; New South Wales v Bardolph(1934) 52 CLR 455 at 509, per Dixon J; Davis v Commonwealth(1998) 166 CLR 79 at 108, per Bren......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT