R v Fletcher; ex parte Kisch
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | [1935] HCA 1,1935-0206 HCA A |
| Year | 1935 |
| Date | 1935 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
- Butera v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Vic)
- Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills
-
Al-Kateb v Godwin
...7 CLR 277; R v Carter; Ex parte Kisch (1934) 52 CLR 221; R v Wilson; Ex parte Kisch (1934) 52 CLR 234; R v Fletcher; Ex parte Kisch (1935) 52 CLR 248; R v Davey; Ex parte Freer (1936) 56 CLR 381; Gamble v Lau Sang (1943) 67 CLR 455; O'Keefe v Calwell (1949) 77 CLR 276 Immigration Restrictio......
-
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party
...J in Wong Hong Toy ([168] supra), citing and adopting the reasoning in the Australian High Court’s decision in The King v Fletcher (1935) 52 CLR 248, held that an untruthful statement of facts upon which the comment was based might vitiate a comment which might otherwise be considered “fair......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...Party[2009] 1 SLR 642 (‘LHL v SDP’) at [173]) is recognised by Singapore law as being a public good (per Evatt J in The King v Fletcher(1935) 52 CLR 248 at 257—259, cited in LHL v SDP, at [173]). In this case, the defendants”‘contemptuous disregard’ for the judicial process and conduct in s......
-
Geoffrey Sawer and the Art of the Academic Commentator: A Preliminary Biographical Sketch
...George Williams, 'Communist Party Case' in Blackshield, Coper and Williams (eds), above n 6, 122. 34 See R v Fletcher; Ex Parte Kisch (1935) 52 CLR 248; R v Dunbabin; Ex Parte Williams (1935) 53 CLR 434. 35 Robin Gollan, 'Baracchi, Guido Carlo Luigi (1887–1975)' in Australian Dictionary of ......
-
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT
...doubt. This is settled law. Criminal contempt being a criminal offence, the Court therefore held in R. v. Fletcher, ex-parte Kisch (1935) 52 C.L.R. 248 that "summary proceedings for contempt are criminal in character, therefore respondents are entitled to invoke the principle that guilt s......
