R v Fuller-Cust

JurisdictionVictoria
Year2002
Date2002
CourtSupreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 cases
  • Munda v Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 October 2013
    ...seriousness of the crime within its local setting and by reference to the particular subjective circumstances of the offender.’ 52 In R v Fuller-Cust49, Eames JA observed that, in the application of the principle stated by Brennan J, regard to an offender's Aboriginality serves to ensure th......
  • The Queen(Appellant) v Yavaz Kilic
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 December 2016
    ...Batt JA agreeing at [26], [27]). 35Huitt [1998] VSCA 118 at [16] per Charles JA (Winneke P and Buchanan JA agreeing at [17], [18]). 36 (2002) 6 VR 496 at 520–524 [78]–[92] per Eames JA. Cf Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37; Munda v Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [20......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Lessons lost in sentencing: welding individualised justice to indigenous justice.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 39 No. 1, August - August 2015
    • 1 August 2015
    ...the ACT, in Patricia Easteal (ed), Justice Connections (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013) 37, 44-7. See also Hopkins, above n 6. (77) (2002) 6 VR 496. (78) Ibid 514-15 [60] (Batt JA), 536 [153]-[155] (O'Bryan (79) Ibid 520 [79]. (80) Ibid 523-4 [90]-[92], 532 [136]-[137], 533 [140]. See ......