R v Glennon
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | 1994-0309 HCA B,[1992] HCA 16,1992-0506 HCA C |
| Year | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
133 cases
- Glennon v R
-
Dupas v The Queen
...trial had ever been ordered by the Supreme Court, the existence of the power to make such an order had been accepted by statements made in R v Glennon18. In that case, Mason CJ and Toohey J 19 said: ‘[A] permanent stay will only be ordered in an extreme case 20 and there must be a fundament......
-
DPP v Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd
...v Walsh [1981] IR 412 approved; State (DPP) v Walsh [1981] IR 412; Rattigan v DPP [2008] IESC 34 [2008] 4 IR 639 and R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 followed; R v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039 considered - Applicant's appeal allowed; no new trial (221/2005 - SC - 5/3/2009) [2009] IESC 20 DP......
-
Brian Rattigan v DPP
...explained in judgments of the High Court of Australia in a case referred to in passing by the learned trial judge namely, R. v. Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592. In the joint judgment of Mason C.J. and Toohey J. which effectively, expressed the majority view, the following passage appears. "Conte......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
The prisoners could not have that fair and impartial trial which justice demands': A fair criminal trial in 19th Century Australia
...1838, 3; and “R v Deeming” The Argus (Melbourne, 23 April 1892) at 3. Indeed, this premise remains valid. See, for example, R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 at 603 per Mason CJ and Toohey J, 614–615 per Brennan J; R v Yuill (1993) 69 A Crim R 450 (NSWCCA) at 453–454 per Kirby ACJ; R v West [1......
-
OPEN JUSTICE, 'BACK-TO-BACK' TRIALS AND JUROR PREJUDICE: EXAMINING THE SUPPRESSION ORDER IN THE TRIAL OF GEORGE PELL.
...(2010) 241 CLR 237, 247-50 [25]-[32], 251 [38] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ) ('Dupas'); R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592, 603 (Mason CJ and Toohey J), 614-15 (Brennan J, Dawson J agreeing at 625) ('Glennon'). See also Alqudsi v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 203, 2......
-
Differential or deferential to media? The effect of prejudicial publicity on judge or jury
...above n 3; News Digital Media Pty Ltd vMokbel (2010) 30 VR248, 267; RvK(2003) 59 NSWLR 431, 448; Gilbert vR(2000) above n 3; Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592, 603; Murphy vR(1989) 167 CLR 94, 99; Hinch vAttorney General (Vic) (1987) 164 CLR 15, 74; Lodhi vR[2007] NSWCCA 360, [153].11. See, e.g., ......
-
Resolving the Application of the Christie Discretion in the Uniform Evidence Legislation
...21 Dupas v R (2010) 241 CLR 237. 22 Ibid 251 [37] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Keifel and Bell JJ), citing R v Glennon (1982) 173 CLR 592, 5989 (Mason CJ and Toohey J agreeing). 23 Ibid [38]. 2014 Resolving the Application of the Christie Discretion 543 ______________________......