R v Gray; ex parte Marsh
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | [1985] HCA 67,1985-1017 HCA B |
Year | 1985 |
Date | 1985 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
85 cases
- Damevski v Giudice
-
Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala
...considerations arise where the officers of the Commonwealth against whom prohibition is sought are members of a federal court. In R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh, Mason J said 92: ‘It has been said that, although prohibition is not a writ of course, it is a writ which goes as of right when the pro......
- Bourne v Campbell
- Re Poposki
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
...above n 39, 334. 297 Re Macks; Ex parte Saint (2000) 204 CLR 158, 236 (Gummow J) ('Re Macks'). See also, R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh (1985) 157 CLR 351, 393 (Dawson J) ('Marsh'). 298 Residual Assco Group Ltd v Spalvins (2000) 202 CLR 629, 637–641 (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and......
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs V Yusuf:1 One Door Closed, Another Opened?
...ex parte Page [1993] AC 682.120 The High Court has affirmed the existence of the distinction in R v Gray; ex parte Marsh(1985) 157 CLR 351; Hockey v Yelland (1986) 159 CLR 656; Public Service Association (SA) vFederated Clerks' Union (SA) (1991) 173 CLR 132 and most recently in Re Refugee R......
-
Tiptoeing through the Tripwires: Recent Developments in Jurisdictional Error
...361. See further K J Seggie, ‘Jurisdictional Error in Administrative Law’ (1965) 5(1) Sydney Law Review 89. 13 Re Grey; ex parte Marsh (1985) 157 CLR 351, 371. 14 See, eg, Mark Aronson, ‘Jurisdictional Error Without The Tears’ in Matthew Groves and H P Lee (eds), Australian Administrative L......
-
Privative clauses: epic fail.
...Affairs (2007) 228 CLR 651, 668 [46], 675 [70] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon and Crennan JJ). (9) R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh (1985) 157 CLR 351. (10) (2003) 211 CLR 476, 482-3 (11) Ibid 513-14 [103]-[104]. These constitutional considerations do not apply to federal courts other th......
Request a trial to view additional results