R v Keenan
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Kirby J.,Hayne J.,Heydon J.,Crennan J.,Kiefel J. |
| Judgment Date | 02 February 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | 2009-0202 HCA B,[2009] HCA 1 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | B23/2008 |
| Date | 02 February 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Edmonds v R
...by that party. The Australian cases 41 The Australian decisions do not support the argument for the appellant, as is illustrated by R v Keenan 52 which, for present purposes, is the leading Australian case. 42 Keenan and three other men were involved in a plan to attack a fifth man. On the ......
-
Hargraves v The Queen
...The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559 at 590 [86]; [2007] HCA 30; HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at 386–387 [121]; [2008] HCA 16; R v Keenan (2009) 236 CLR 397 at 425 [91], 436–437 [133]; [2009] HCA 1; Pollock v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 233 at 251–252 [67]; [2010] HCA 35. 31RPS (2000) 199 CLR 62......
-
The Queen v Getachew
...Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559 at 590 [86]; [2007] HCA 30; HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at 386 –387 [121]; [2008] HCA 16; R v Keenan (2009) 236 CLR 397 at 425 [91], 436–437 [133]; [2009] HCA 1; Pollock v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 233 at 251–252 [67]; [2010] HCA 35; Hargraves v The Queen (201......
-
James v R
...Hunt J. 53R v Willersdorf [2001] QCA 183 at [17], [20] per Thomas JA, McPherson JA agreeing at [3], Chesterman J agreeing at [32]. 54 (2009) 236 CLR 397 at 438 [138], Hayne J agreeing at 422 [80], Heydon J agreeing at 425 [92], Crennan J agreeing at 425 [93]; [2009] HCA 55 (2009) 236 CLR 39......
Request a trial to view additional results