R v Smith
| Jurisdiction | South Australia |
| Court | Supreme Court of South Australia |
| Date | 1987 |
| Year | 1987 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
88 cases
- Connect TV Pty Ltd v All Rounder Investments Pty Ltd (No 4)
-
DPP v Cunningham
...after sentence being a matter for the Executive, not the appellate court. See further R v O'Shea (1982) 31 SASR 129 and R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587. These authorities recognise, as did two early decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in England (R v Green 13 CAR 200 and R vFerrua 14 CAR ......
- Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc.
-
Muldrock v The Queen
...JJ; [1981] HCA 67; Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 at 623 [41] per McHugh, Hayne and Callinan JJ. 27 R v Totten [2003] NSWCCA 207. 28 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 29 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 at 183 [56]–[59]; Elyard v The Queen (2006) 45 MVR 402 at 407 [18]. 30 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
OFFENDERS RISKING DEPORTATION DESERVE A SENTENCING DISCOUNT - BUT THE REDUCTION SHOULD BE PROVISIONAL.
...[2011] 2 Qd R 328. (103) Ibid 346 [65] (Muir JA, Fraser JA agreeing at 349 [80], Chesterman JA agreeing at 349 [81]). (104) R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587, 589-90 (King CJ, Cox J agreeing at 590, O'Loughlin J agreeing at 590). See, eg, Eliasen v The Queen (1991) 53 A Crim R 391, 396-7 (Crocke......