R v W.E.F
| Jurisdiction | Victoria |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1998 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
44 cases
-
DPP v Cunningham
...materials on which Mr. O'Connell relied. The principle in Babic, cited above, was summarised by Winneke P. in the later case of ER v.WEF [1998] 2VR 385 as follows:- "In normal circumstances, if it is suggested that subsequent events have made or made to appear a sentence, appropriate when p......
-
Bianamu v Rigby
...[1998] 2 VR 79; R v C [2004] SASC 244; R v Clark [2017] QCA 318; R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359; R v Mills [1998] 4 VR 235; R v WEF (1998) 2 VR 385; Smith v R (1987) 44 SASR 587; Re Coldham; Ex parte Brideson (1990) 170 CLR 267 The Queen v MacGowan [1986] 42 SASR 580; The Queen v Nguyen......
-
The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v Colbert
...exclusive. If it can be said that a sentence is now ‘manifestly excessive’ as was contemplated in the Australian case of R v W.E.F. [1998] 2 V.R. 385 quoted in Cunningham, and a matter is still before a court, then the existence of an executive power of clemency should not preclude a court ......
-
Mizanul Rahman Islam v Paul Howard Wasley and Dylan Ross
...Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court, Nield AJ, 26 July 2012). R v Meyboom (2012) 256 FLR 450 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385 Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT), ss 61, 65, 66, 74 Magistrates Court Act 1930 (ACT), Pt 3.10 APPEAL-GENERAL PRINCIPLES — in general a......
Request a trial to view additional results