Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Ramsay v Watson

Cited authorities 5 Cited in 85 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1961] HCA 65,1961-1026 HCA B
Year1961
Date1961
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
76 cases
  • Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA`
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 1 September 2000
    ... ... In particular, Cohen LJ, with whom Birkett LJ agreed, expressly approved (at pp 35-36) the conclusion and reasoning of Seller J. In Watson v Ramsay [1961] 78 WN (NSW) 64 , the plaintiff was employed under the Public Service Act 1902 and upon retirement as a result of incapacity which ... ...
  • Bhp Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd v National Competition Council
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Melbourne v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Csr Ltd v Della Maddalena
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 February 2006
    ...Ltd v McAuslan (1993) 47 FCR 492. 98 cf Stead (1986) 161 CLR 141. 99 (2002) 211 CLR 317 at 415–418 [292]–[296]. 100Ramsay v Watson (1961) 108 CLR 642 at 101 cf Gordon v The Queen (1982) 41 ALR 64. 102Mount Lawley Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission (2004) 29 WAR 273 at 283 [27]......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Expert evidence in New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 September 2021
    ...evidence and/or facts which are duly available to the expert: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 at [41] and Ramsay v Watson (1961) 108 CLR 642 at In obiter dicta, Heydon JA set out the requirements which experts must adhere to, to ensure compliance with s 79(1) in Makita (Austral......
  • Expert evidence in New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 September 2021
    ...evidence and/or facts which are duly available to the expert: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 at [41] and Ramsay v Watson (1961) 108 CLR 642 at In obiter dicta, Heydon JA set out the requirements which experts must adhere to, to ensure compliance with s 79(1) in Makita (Austral......
3 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...at [12], per Mimmie Chan J (appeal allowed, on unrelated grounds [2019] HKCA 167, and see also [2019] HKCA 488). 542 Ramsay v Watson (1961) 108 CLR 642; Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 at [85], per Heydon JA; Miljus v CSR Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 598; Sun Cheong Con......
  • The Basis of the ‘Basis Rule’: The Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...above n 4, vol 2 [108]. 20 Dasreef (2011) 243 CLR 588, 616 [74]. 21 Freckelton and Selby, above n 1. 22 See [1975] QB 834, 841–2. 23 (1961) 108 CLR 642, 649. 24 See, eg, Palmer-Bruyn and Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 [138] and the cases discussed below. 25 Dasreef (2011) 243 C......
  • Mental Health Expertise in Refugee Status Decision-Making: Judging or Caring?
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 18-4, October 2014
    • 1 October 2014
    ...JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFMENTAL HEALTH EXPERTISE IN REFUGEE STATUS DECISION-MAKING60 (1999) 197 CLR 414 at [39] citing Ramsay vWatson (1961) 108 CLR 642; Arnotts Ltd vTrade PracticesCommission (1990) 24 FCR 313 at 347–8. See also Jango vNorthern Territory (No. 4) (2005) 214 ALR 608.This p......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT