Re Evelyn

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Year1998
Date1998
CourtFamily Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Re G (Children) (Residence: Same-sex Partner)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 d3 Julho d3 2006
    ...92-421, and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC 92-415 and Re Evelyn [1998] FamCA 55: "I am of the opinion that the fact of parenthood is to be regarded as an important and significant factor in considering which proposals b......
  • Re D (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 d3 Março d3 2014
    ...92–421, and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC 92–415 and Re Evelyn [1998] FamCA 55: "I am of the opinion that the fact of parenthood is to be regarded as an important and significant factor in considering which proposals bet......
  • Re E-R (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 d5 Abril d5 2015
    ...92–421, and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC 92–415 and Re Evelyn [1998] FamCA 55: "I am of the opinion that the fact of parenthood is to be regarded as an important and significant factor in considering which proposals bet......
  • Tomkins and Ward v Ward and Richards (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Surrogacy: all the features of a relationship that could go wrong?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne Journal of Politics No. 28, January 2001
    • 1 d1 Janeiro d1 2001
    ...1984 (NSW) Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988 (Qld) Surrogate Contracts Act 1993 (Tas) Substitute Parent Agreement Act 1994 (ACT) "Re Evelyn" (1998) FamCA 55 BR7321 of Baram, M.S. & McAllister, K. (1982) Alternatives to Regulation (Lexington, Lexington Books). Bible, Genesis Blank, R.H. (198......