Re McBain

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron,Gummow JJ,McHugh J,Kirby J,Hayne J,Callinan J
Judgment Date18 April 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] HCA 16,2002-0418 HCA B
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberC22/2000
Date18 April 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
131 cases
  • Employers Reinsurance Corporation v Ashmere Cove Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Australian Institute of Private Detectives Ltd v Privacy Commissioner
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Attorney General of the Cayman Islands v James Cleaver & Company and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 6 June 2006
    ... ... There is a general public interest in the prosecution of offences. The Attorney General is an appropriate constitutional officer to be heard by the court having regard to his role representing the public interest." ... 26 Finally, the Board notes In re McBain , ex p. Australian Catholic Bishops Conference [2002] HCA 16 , where the High Court refused an application by the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Australia to intervene in order to pursue an appeal against a judgment given in first instance proceedings in relation to which no party below ... ...
  • Combet v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 October 2005
    ...at 54–55 [143]–[144]. 251Brown v West (1990) 169 CLR 195. 252 They relied on Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372. See eg at 449 254 (1975) 134 CLR 338 at 364. In the United States, in a number of cases the Supreme Court has found particular appropri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Compulsory Examination Of Employee Not Tantamount To Compulsion Of Corporate Accused
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 10 June 2020
    ...in the criminal proceedings in a fundamental way. The High Court Overrules In Commonwealth of Australia v Helicopter Resources Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 16, the High Court held that the compulsory pre-trial examination of an employee in circumstances where s 87(1)(b) of the Uniform Evidence Law ha......
29 books & journal articles
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...(Qld) (1991) 173 CLR 289, 303, 316, 321–2; Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 ('Ainsworth'), 582. 94 (2002) 209 CLR 372 ('Re McBain'). 95 Ibid 382 (Gleeson CJ), citing In re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921) 29 CLR 257, 267. 540 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ______......
  • Human Rights Protection in Australia: Interpretation Provisions and Parliamentary Supremacy
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...The High Court upheld the decision but did not consider the question of inconsistency: Re McBain; Ex parte Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372. For analysis of the McBain litigation, see Kristen Walker, 'The Bishops, The Doctor, His Patient, and the Attorney-General: The Conclusi......
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...555 [118] (Gaudron J), 570 [164] (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 585 [215] (Kirby J); Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372, 388–9 [3]–[4], 396 [25]–[26] (Gleeson CJ), 405–6 [62], 408 [72], 410 [76] (Gaudron and Gummow JJ), 449 [204] (Kirby J), 458–9 [242], 46......
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57, 122–3 [211]–[212]; Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372 at 439–440 [173]; Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 at 1185 [122]. 11......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT