Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Palme

Judgment Cited authorities 60 Cited in 169 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Heydon JJ,McHugh J,Kirby J
Judgment Date02 October 2003
Neutral Citation2003-1002 HCA A,[2003] HCA 56
Docket NumberS258/2002
Date02 October 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
155 cases
10 books & journal articles
  • 'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 Agosto 2009
    ...of this provision by Kirby J (in dissent), see Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212, (355) See above n 295, where AB (2007) 96 ALD 53, Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 and other cases are discussed. (356) Migration Act ss 474(1......
  • Judicial Review of Migration Decisions: Life after S157
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 Marzo 2005
    ...[71]–[85] ('S134'). See also Kirby J's dissent in Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212, 247–8 [121]. 129 SGLB (2004) 207 ALR 12, 51 [130]. 130 In S134, it was alleged that the RRT failed to consider a material fact, namely t......
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 Septiembre 2011
    ...(Oxford Univer sity Press, 2008) 208. See also Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212, 250–1 [129] (Kirby J). The wider issues are examined in careful detail in Leighton McDonald, 'The Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial ......
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 Septiembre 2011
    ...remove the substantive limits of power, taken together they may do so. This point is considered in greater detail in Part III below. 27 (2003) 216 CLR 212. 28 (2003) 2 16 CLR 212, 224–6 (Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Heydon JJ), 227–8 (McHugh J). A similar provision was considered in Deputy Commis......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT