Re Patterson; ex parte Taylor

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court (Australia)
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron J,McHugh J,Gummow,Hayne JJ,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date06 September 2001
Neutral Citation2001-0906 HCA B,[2001] HCA 51
Docket NumberS165/2000
Date06 September 2001

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
63 cases
  • Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 11 November 2010
    ...24 at 37–38 per Mason J; [1986] HCA 40; Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 449–453 [176]–[188] per Gummow and Hayne JJ; [2001] HCA 51. 29 Aronson, Dyer and Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 4th ed (2009) at 343–345 30 (1999) 92 FCR 35 . 31 (1990) 170 CLR 596......
  • Clubb v Edwards
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 10 April 2019
    ...Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co v Wellman (1892) 143 US 339 at 345. 19 Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 473 [249]; [2001] HCA 51. 20 Attorney-General for NSW v Brewery Employes Union of NSW (1908) 6 CLR 469 at 21 Unions NSW v New South Wales (2013) 252 CLR 530 at 554 [36......
  • Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 23 June 2010
    ...Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 419 [82] per Gaudron J, 446–447 [167] per Gummow and Hayne JJ, 502 [329] per Kirby J; [2001] HCA 51. 23Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice (2008) 234 CLR 275 at 300 [57] per Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Heydon and Kiefel 24 (1989) 168 CLR 210......
  • Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 7 September 2012
    ...(2000) 204 CLR 82 at 100–101 [39]–[41]. 89 At [66]–[67]. 90 See Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 448–449 [175]–[176]; [2001] HCA 51. 91Offshore Processing Case (2010) 243 CLR 319 at 350 92Osland v Secretary to Department of Justice [No 2] (2010) 241 CLR 320 at 329 [13], 3......
  • Get Started for Free