Re Rondahl
| Jurisdiction | South Australia |
| Court | Supreme Court of South Australia |
| Date | 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份And Another v 張才奎And Another
...was not allowed to vote at the EGM. The decision was upheld by a majority of 2:1 of the Full Court of South Australia (See: Re Rondahl (2005) 226 ALR 475). The majority took the view that the administrator pendente lite should act in an impartial manner and not prefer one class of beneficia......
-
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份And Another v 張才奎And Another
...was not allowed to vote at the EGM. The decision was upheld by a majority of 2:1 of the Full Court of South Australia (See: Re Rondahl (2005) 226 ALR 475). The majority took the view that the administrator pendente lite should act in an impartial manner and not prefer one class of beneficia......
-
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份And Another v 張才奎And Another
...was not allowed to vote at the EGM. The decision was upheld by a majority of 2:1 of the Full Court of South Australia (See: Re Rondahl (2005) 226 ALR 475). The majority took the view that the administrator pendente lite should act in an impartial manner and not prefer one class of beneficia......
-
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份And Another v 張才奎And Another
...was not allowed to vote at the EGM. The decision was upheld by a majority of 2:1 of the Full Court of South Australia (See: Re Rondahl (2005) 226 ALR 475). The majority took the view that the administrator pendente lite should act in an impartial manner and not prefer one class of beneficia......
Request a trial to view additional results