Re La Rosa; ex parte Norgard v Rodpat Nominees Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 1991-0819 FCA B |
Year | 1990 |
Date | 1990 |
Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
20 cases
- Burke v Lfot Pty Ltd
-
Friend v Brooker
...NSWCA 385 at [34]. 33 See Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (In Liq) (2008) 232 CLR 635 at 661–663 [75]–[78]. 34 Re La Rosa; Ex parte Norgard v Rodpat Nominees Pty Ltd (1991) 31 FCR 83 at 35 (2002) 209 CLR 282 at 301–302 [44]–[46]. 36 Ruabon Steamship Co v London Assurance [1900] AC 6 at......
- Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 4)
-
Burke v Lfot Pty Ltd
...Australia (1995) at [622]. 49 [1986] AC 562. 50 Smith v Cock [1911] AC 317. 51 Re La Rosa; Ex parte Norgard v Rodpat Nominees Pty Ltd (1991) 31 FCR 83 at 91 per French 52 [1900] AC 6. 53 [1900] AC 6 at 12. 54 (2001) 51 NSWLR 624 at 633 [30]. 55 (2001) 51 NSWLR 624 at 630 [21], citing Kitto......
Request a trial to view additional results