Registrar-General (New South Wales) v Wood
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1926-1112 HCA B,[1926] HCA 43 |
| Date | 1926 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Mccormick v Allen
-
Peter Low LLC v Higgins, Danial Patrick
...at p 218 that: It has been held in Australia that the interest of a joint tenant can be taken under a writ; Registrar-General v Wood (1926) 39 C.L.R. 46. So also that of a tenant in common; In re Guss (1927) 28 S.R. (N.S.W.) 226. There is nothing in this Ordinance which makes those decision......
-
Ong Boon Hwee v Cheah Ng Soo and another
...at p 218): “It has been held in Australia that the interest of a joint tenant can be taken under a writ; Registrar-General v Wood (1926) 39 C.L.R. 46. So also that of a tenant in common; In re Guss (1927) 28 S.R. (N.S.W.) 226. There is nothing in this Ordinance which makes those decisions i......
-
Chain Land Elevator Corp v FB Industries Pte Ltd and others
...at p 218: It has been held in Australia that the interest of a joint tenant can be taken under a writ; Registrar-General v Wood (1926) 39 C.L.R. 46. So also that of a tenant in common; In re Guss (1927) 28 S.R. (N.S.W.) 226. There is nothing in this Ordinance which makes those decisions ina......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY: ENFORCING WRITS OF SEIZURE AND SALE AGAINST JOINT TENANCIES
...he wrote:52 It has been held in Australia that the interest of a joint tenant can be taken under a writ [citing Registrar-General v Wood (1926) 39 CLR 46]. So also that of a tenant in common [citing In re Guss (1927) 28 SR (NSW) 226]. There is nothing in this Ordinance which makes those dec......