Rejfek v Mcelroy

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1965-0813 HCA B,[1965] HCA 46
Year1965
Date1965
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
172 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • The Briginshaw 'standard of proof' in anti-discrimination law: 'pointing with a wavering finger'.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 2, August 2003
    • 1 August 2003
    ...75 511 (Mathews J, Members Thiering and Swinbourne). (4) John Dyson Heydon, Cross on Evidence (6th ed, 2000) 247. (5) Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517, 521-2 (Barwick CJ, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Windeyer (6) Sodeman v The King (1936) 55 CLR 192, 216 (Dixon J). (7) (1938) 60 CLR 336. (......
  • Evaluating the judicial interpretation of civil commitment schemes for serious sex offenders.
    • Australia
    • University of Western Sydney Law Review No. 12, January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...[64]. (131) Tillman v A-G (NSW) (2007) 70 NSWLR 448 (132) Ibid 450-451. (133) Ibid 461-462. (134) Ibid 451; also see Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517, 521 (Barwick CJ, Kitto, Menzies and Windeyer (135) [2008] NSWCA 33 (Unreported, Mason P, Giles and Hodgson JJA, 18 March 2008). (136) Til......
  • Civil liability and the 50%+ standard of proof
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 25-3, July 2021
    • 1 July 2021
    ...for civil trials and the beyond reasonable doubt standard for criminal trials (see for instance, Gabriel, 2013; Rejfek vMcElroy 112 CLR 517 [1965]; Re B (Children) [2008] UKHL 35). In the United States, however, there are further standards ofproof that are given official legal status; the ‘......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT