Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2009-0406 FCA C
Year2009
Date2009
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 cases
  • KTC v David
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 13 April 2022
    ...Pty Ltd (in liq) v Fergusson (2007) 209 FLR 1; [2007] VSC 57 Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Limited (2009) 176 FCR 66; [2009] FCA 320 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2005] FCA ......
  • Hazel Joan Corkhill v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 7 August 2015
    ... ... Reeve v Commonwealth [2014] ACTSC 1 Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (2009) 176 ... ...
  • Fair Work Ombudsman v Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 14 October 2021
    ...to the opposing party in a way that cannot be compensated by costs: Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (2009) 176 FCR 66 at [21]-[22]; Ron Medich Properties Pty Ltd v Bentley-Smythe Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 494 at [8]. Rule 16.21 of the FCR identifies the grounds on wh......
  • Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Yatala Labour Prison Case)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 6 May 2022
    ...(2010) 198 IR 244 Rafferty v Madgwicks [2012] FCAFC 37; (2012) 287 ALR 437 Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 320; (2009) 176 FCR 66 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] FCAFC 213; (2002) 118 FCR 236 Walsh v Tattersal......
  • Get Started for Free