Rich v Harrington
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] FCAFC 35 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Date | 2007 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
- Dye v Commonwealth Securities Ltd (No 5)
- Zentai v Honourable Brendan O'connor (No 2)
-
Denham Constructions Project Company 810 Pty Ltd v Rosemarie Risgalla
... ... ) 8 ACTLR 65 Gardner v The Dairy Industry Authority of New South Wales (1978) 52 ALJR 180 Harrington v Rich (2008) 166 FCR 440 Harris v Willis (1855) 15 CB 710 Harvey v Phillips ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Legal professional privilege and deregistered companies: who holds the right to claim?
...Co (Canberra) Ltd (1995) 37 NSWLR 405 at 409-10; Marshall v Prescott [2013] NSWCA 152. [17] Rich v Harrington (2007) 245 ALR 106; [(2007) FCA 1987]. [18] Patrick v Capital Finance Corp (Australasia) Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1249: Tamberlin J considered the question as to whether common interest p......
-
In-House Counsel, the Requirement of Independence and Legal Professional Privilege in Australia
...The Situation: A line of authority, typically associated with Rich v Harrington [2007] FCA 1987, (2007) 245 ALR 106 ("Rich"), has held that for legal professional privilege to be claimed in relation to advice from an in-house lawyer, that lawyer must be independent so that personal loyaltie......