Riddle v Riddle

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1952-0314 HCA B,[1952] HCA 12
Date1952
Year1952
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • Rajabali Jumabhoy and Others v Ameerali R Jumabhoy and Others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 20 Mayo 1998
    ...purpose vested in the trustees by the trust instrument, if any, or by law`. 86.The Australian case of Riddle & Ors v Riddle & Anor [1951] 85 CLR 202, cited by the respondents, does not assist their case. In that case, there was no power of investments given in the will and the trustees` pow......
  • Re Compensation Fund established under s 75 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2000 Ed)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 22 Octubre 2001
    ...from the making of the order: at [28].] Leo Teng Choy v Leo Teng Kit [2000] 3 SLR (R) 636; [2001] 1 SLR 256 (refd) Riddle v Riddle (1952) 85 CLR 202 (folld) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2000 Rev Ed) ss 75 (5), 75 (9) (d) (consd);s 75 Trustees Act (Cap 337, 1999 Rev Ed) s 56 (consd);ss 2 (......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT