Rigg v Baker

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date2006
Neutral Citation[2006] FCAFC 179
Year2006
Date2006

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
26 cases
  • Narain v Euroasia (Pacific) Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Zaghloul v Jewellery & Gift Buying Service Pty Ltd t/as Nationwide Jewellers
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 July 2020
    ...of Taxation (1987) 17 FCR 402 Re Papps; Ex parte Tapp (1987) 78 FCR 524 Re Stewart; Ex parte Barrett (1967) 10 FLR 99 Rigg v Baker [2006] FCAFC 179; (2006) 155 FCR 531 Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2007] FCA 2059 Stankiewicz v Plata [2000] FCA 118......
  • Samootin v Wagner
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 July 2008
    ...(1987) 16 FCR 396 considered Re Papps; Ex parte Tapp (1997) 78 FCR 524 followed Re Williams (1968) 13 FLR 10 considered Rigg v Baker [2006] FCAFC 179, 155 FCR 531 Samootin v Insolvency & Trustee Service Australia [2007] FCA 1596 cited Samootin v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2007] FCA 161......
  • Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 May 2020
    ...order was made: Re Williams (1968) 13 FLR 10 at 24-5; Boles at 247; Re Papps; ex parte Tapp (1997) 78 FCR 524 at 531; Rigg v Baker [2006] FCAFC 179 at [79]; Cottrell v Wilcox [2002] FCA 1115 at [7]. Additional considerations are collected in D. A. Hassall, "Annulment of Bankruptcy and Revie......
  • Get Started for Free