Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v Iinet Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2010-0204 FCA A
Date2010
Year2010
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • RecordTV Pte Ltd v MediaCorp TV Singapore Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 1 December 2010
    ...of the act concerned”. This obligation has been recognised more recently by Cowdroy J in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 24 (“iiNet”). Turning to English law, the English cases of, inter alia, CBS Inc and Another v Ames Records & Tapes Ltd [1982] Ch 91, CBS Songs Lt......
  • Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 20 April 2012
    ...Legal Solicitors) No appearance for the Australian Privacy Foundation seeking leave to appear as amicus curiae Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited High Court of Australia — Appellate jurisdiction — Procedure — Interveners and amicus curiae — Whether leave should be granted. Words and p......
  • Twentieth Century Fox Film Corpn v Newzbin Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • RecordTV Pte Ltd v MediaCorp TV Singapore Pte Ltd and others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Three Judges (Singapore)
    • 1 December 2010
    ...of the act concerned”. This obligation has been recognised more recently by Cowdroy J in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 24 (“iiNet”). Turning to English law, the English cases of, inter alia, CBS Inc and Another v Ames Records & Tapes Ltd [1982] Ch 91, CBS Songs Lt......
  • Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
  • Intermediary Liability and Indirect Infringement for Marketplaces in Europe and the United States
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 11 July 2020
    ...(2016). 55Id., para. 36. Ben Natter Music Austl. Pty. Ltd. v. Cooper, [2005] FCA 972(Fed.Ct. Austl.), aff’d <Films Pty Ltd v. iiNet Limited (No. 3), [2010] FCA 24(Fed. Ct. Austl.). 5Societe Belge Des Auters Compositeurs Et Editeurs (SABAM) v. S.A. Scarlet, No. 04/8975/A (Dist. Ct. Brussels,......
  • No copyright protection for telephone companies - Telstra v Phone Directories Company
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 February 2010
    ...consider this 'without delay'. 1 On 4 February 2010, the Federal Court delivered its judgment in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited [2010] FCA 24 which was a test case about whether an internet service provider had authorised copyright infringement (see our report at http://www.dlaphill......
  • Recent Developments in Australian Copyright Law - iiNet, Telstra, Optus TV Now and PPCA
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 31 March 2012
    ...service is still a broadcast service. 2. iiNet Decision (a) Decision at First Instance The Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No. 3) [2010] FCA 24 ("iiNet Decision") is a Federal Court decision that considered whether an internet service provider (ISP) is responsible for users who use ......
  • iiNet decision frees other ISPs from risk of reprisals from copyright owners
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 8 February 2010
    ...4 February 2010, the Federal Court of Australia gave its highly anticipated judgment in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No. 3) [2010] FCA 24. This case is widely regarded as a test case on the issue of whether copyright owners can hold Internet Service Providers (ISP) responsible fo......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...of the Select Committee on the Copyright Bill 1986 (No 8/1986) (Parl 9 of 1986, 22 December 1986) at A 173. 131[2012] HCA 16 (HC, Aust); [2010] FCA 24 (Fed Ct, Aust). 132Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd[2012] HCA 16 (HC, Aust) at [55]. 133 Tort lawyers will be aware of the immense problem......
  • Management and Enforcement
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Intellectual Property Law. Second Edition
    • 15 June 2011
    ...v. Red Box Toy Factory Ltd ., [1999] F.S.R. 785 (Ch.), approved in OBG , above note 279; Roadshow Films Pty Ltd. v. iiNet Ltd. (No. 3) , [2010] FCA 24 at [492] (Austl. Fed. Ct.), aff’d [2011] FCAFC 23 (Austl. Full Fed. Ct.). 301 OmegaNutrel Inc. v. Food Systems Innovation Inc. , 2005 FC 137......