Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeKiefel CJ,Bell,Keane,Edelman JJ.,Gageler J.,Nettle J.,Gordon J.
Judgment Date14 June 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] HCA 20
Docket NumberS226/2016
CourtHigh Court
Date14 June 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
124 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Abuse: Childcare centre appeal decision.
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 6 July 2022
    ...inadmissibility of the body of cross-tendency evidence relied upon in relation to it: [178]–[179]. Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14, applied. As to D’s disclosures As with B’s claim, the primary judge’s reasoning was vit......
  • Abuse: Childcare centre appeal decision.
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 6 July 2022
    ...inadmissibility of the body of cross-tendency evidence relied upon in relation to it: [178]–[179]. Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14, applied. As to D’s disclosures As with B’s claim, the primary judge’s reasoning was vit......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT