Roberts on behalf of the Widjabul Wia-Bal People v Attorney-General of New South Wales

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date17 June 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 103
Date17 June 2020
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • District Council of Streaky Bay v Wilson
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 18 October 2021
    ...169 Peterson v Western Australia [2017] FCA 1056 Roberts on behalf of the Widjabul Wia-Bal People v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2020] FCAFC 103 Rubibi Community v State of Western Australia (No 7) [2006] FCA 45 Summers v Repatriation Commission [2015] FCAFC 36; 230 FCR 179 Universi......
  • Griffith Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General of New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 October 2020
    ...Queensland [2019] FCAFC 233; (2019) 375 ALR 717 Roberts on behalf of the Widjabul Wia-Bal People v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2020] FCAFC 103 State of Western Australia v Brown [2014] HCA 8; (2014) 253 CLR 507 The Wik Peoples v The State of Queensland [1996] HCA 40; (1996) 187 CLR......
  • John Bridgeman Limited, in the matter of John Bridgeman Limited v National Stock Exchange of Australia Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 July 2020
    ...Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Cases cited: Roberts on behalf of the Widjabul Wia-Bal People v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2020] FCAFC 103 Date of hearing: Determined on the papers Registry: Queensland Division: General Division National Pto the issues of liability because his invo......
  • Roberts on behalf of the Widjabul Wia-Bal People v Attorney-General of New South Wales (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 28 July 2020
    ...– application granted, cross-appeal allowed Cases cited: Roberts on behalf of the Widjabul Wia-Bal v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2020] FCAFC 103 Date of hearing: Determined on the papers Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National P9 is set aside. Note: Entry of o......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Litigation Funding Comparative Guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2023
    ...held that funders need not comply with the MIS provisions of the Corporations Act (LCM Funding Pty Ltd v Stanwell Corporation Limited [2020] FCAFC 103). And on 10 December 2022, the current federal government expressly reversed the effect of the 2020 regulations with the enactment of the Co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT