De Rose v South Australia
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judgment Date | 2002 |
Neutral Citation | 2002-1101 FCA C,2003-1216 FCA A |
Year | 2002 |
Date | 2002 |
Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
48 cases
4 books & journal articles
-
The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
...123–5 (Merkel J). 60 Yorta Yorta (2002) 214 CLR 422, 454 [80] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ). 61 De Rose v State of South Australia [2002] FCA 1342 (Unreported, O'Loughlin J, 1 November 2002) [570]. This decision and others sharing the same case history will be hereafter referred to as '......
-
A hope disillusioned, an opportunity lost? Reflections on common law native title and ten years of the Native Title Act.
...not be restricted to groups in settled areas where there has been considerable movement and dislocation: see De Rose v South Australia [2002] FCA 1342 (Unreported, O'Loughlin J, 1 November (377) The consequence of its finding that the title is a "bundle of rights': Ward (2002) 191 ALR 1, 35......
-
Disinterested truth: legitimation of the doctrine of tenure post-Mabo.
...concerned with the traditional society's collective rights, not those of individuals': at 90. See also De Rose v South Australia [2002] FCA 1342 (Unreported, O'Loughlin J, 1 November, (111) Edgeworth, above n 76, 413. (112) (2000) 99 FCR 316, 349. (113) (1999) 100 FCR 7, 24 ('Lansen'). See ......
-
Law in the present tense: tradition and cultural continuity in Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v. Victoria.
...1606 (Unreported, Olney J, 18 December 1998) [122]. (145) Ibid [122]. (146) Weiner, above n 92, 8. (147) Ward (2002) 191 ALR 1. (148) [2002] FCA 1342 (Unreported, O'Loughlin J, 1 November (149) (2002) 190 ALR 313. (150) See, eg, Jopson, above n 78, 7; Jennifer Clarke, Why It's (Almost) Not ......