Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 16) (Central West Wik determination)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date06 July 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] FCA 733
Date06 July 2023
CourtFederal Court


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 16) (Central West Wik determination) [2023] FCA 733

File number(s):

QUD 673 of 2014



Judgment of:

MORTIMER CJ



Date of judgment:

6 July 2023



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – nomination of prescribed body corporate



Legislation:

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 56, 61, 66, 67, 84D, 87A, 94A, 199C, 225



Cases cited:

Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) (Kuuku Ya’u determination) [2021] FCA 1464

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 3) (Uutaalnganu (Night Island) determination) [2021] FCA 1465

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 6) (Northern Kaanju determination) [2022] FCA 770

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 7) (Southern Kaantju determination) [2022] FCA 771

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 8) (Ayapathu determination) [2022] FCA 772

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 9) (Lama Lama determination) [2022] FCA 773

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 10) [2022] FCA 1129

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 11) (Atambaya determination) [2022] FCA 1176

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 12) (Gudang Yadhaykenu determination) [2022] FCA 1177

Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 13) (NCY#2 independent parcels determination) [2022] FCA 1178

Taylor on behalf of the Yamatji Nation Claim v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 42



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Queensland



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

74



Date of hearing:

Determined on the papers



Counsel for the Applicants:

Mr D O’Gorman SC with Mr D M Yarrow



Solicitor for the Applicants:

Cape York Land Council Aboriginal Corporation



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Ms C Klease with Ms A Tarrago



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Crown Law Queensland



ORDERS


QUD 673 of 2014

BETWEEN:

MICHAEL ROSS, SILVA BLANCO, JAMES CREEK, JONATHAN KORKAKTAIN, REGINALD WILLIAMS, WAYNE BUTCHER, CLARRY FLINDERS, PHILIP PORT, HS (DECEASED)

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

First Respondent


COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (and others named in the Schedule)

Second Respondent



order made by:

MORTIMER CJ

DATE OF ORDER:

6 July 2023



BEING SATISFIED that an order in the terms set out below is within the power of the Court, and it appearing appropriate to the Court to do so, pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth);


THE COURT NOTES THAT:


A. Having regard to the need to balance the limited availability of public resources with the competing need to resolve applications for a determination of native title in an efficient, cost effective and timely manner, the parties agree that the question of whether s 47C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) would apply to any park area within the External Boundary will be addressed after the matter has proceeded to determination.

B. The Central West Wik People (being the proposed native title holders described in Schedule 1 of the Determination) have indicated a desire to enter into negotiations with the State of Queensland (the State) in relation to whether s 47C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) would have application to the land and waters within Lot 25 on SP241398 (the park area).

C. Subject to paragraph D below, the parties agree that, if agreement is reached in accordance with s 47C(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) that s 47C is applicable to the park area, the parties would not oppose an application being brought on behalf of the Ngan-Aak Kunch Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (ICN: 4097) pursuant to ss 13(1)(b) and (5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) to vary the Determination in relation to the park area within the Determination Area for which agreement is reached regarding the application of s 47C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

D. The agreement of the parties described in paragraph C above not to oppose an application being brought to vary the Determination in relation to the park area, is subject to the Applicant and the State having reached agreement on the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests that would be determined to exist in relation to the park area, and any other relevant matters.

E. The Applicant agrees that the areas listed in Schedule 5 are areas where native title has been wholly extinguished.


THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. There be a determination of native title in the terms proposed in these orders, despite any actual or arguable defect in the authorisation of the applicant to seek and agree to a consent determination pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).



BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. Pursuant to s 199C(1A) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), the Registrar is not to remove the following indigenous land use agreements from the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements, at least to the extent the indigenous land use agreements fall within the External Boundary:

a. Peninsula Developmental Road ILUA (QI2016/049); and

b. Oyala Thumotang National Park (Cape York Peninsula Aboriginal Land) and adjacent Aboriginal Land ILUA (QI2012/071).

2. There be a determination of native title in the terms set out below (the Determination).

3. Each party to the proceedings is to bear its own costs.

BY CONSENT THE COURT DETERMINES THAT:

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

4. In this Determination, unless the contrary intention appears:

“Animal” has the meaning given in the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld);

“External Boundary” means the area described in Schedule 3;

“land” has the same meaning as in the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth);

“Laws of the State and the Commonwealth” means the common law and the laws of the State of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia, and includes legislation, regulations, statutory instruments, local planning instruments and local laws;

“Local Government Area” has the meaning given in the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld);

“Native Title Determination Application” means the Cape York United #1 native title claim filed on 11 December 2014 in QUD 673 of 2014;

“Natural Resources” means:

(a) an Animal, a Plant, or any other non-human life form; and

(b) inorganic material;

but does not include:

(c) Animals that are the private personal property of any person;

(d) crops that are the private personal property of another;

(e) minerals as defined in the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld); and

(f) petroleum as defined in the Petroleum Act 1923 (Qld) and the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (Qld);

“Plant” has the meaning given in the Nature Conservation...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex