Ross v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1922] HCA 4,1922-0405 HCA A
Date1922
Year1922
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Kelly v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 Marzo 2004
    ...258 at 265; Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517; Wright v The Queen (1977) 15 ALR 305. In fact, the danger was recognised earlier: Ross v The King (1922) 30 CLR 246; McKay v The King (1935) 54 CLR 1; Stuart v The Queen (1959) 101 CLR 1; cf Kirby, ‘Controls Over Investigation of Offences......
  • Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 31 Agosto 2000
    ...reversing findings of fact at first instance, or occasionally, in upholding appeals at all. As late as 1922, for example, Higgins J in Ross v The King176, a criminal appeal, was still resistant to the application, according to its tenor of s 593 of the Crimes Act 1915 (Vic) which allowed ac......
  • James v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 Marzo 2014
    ...610; Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158 at 163 per Gibbs CJ, Wilson, Brennan and Deane JJ; [1986] HCA 76. 32Ross v The King (1922) 30 CLR 246 at 254 per Knox CJ, Gavan Duffy and Starke JJ, 274 per Higgins J; [1922] HCA 4; R v Evans [1969] VR 858 at 867–874 per O'Bryan and Little JJ......
  • Carr v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT