Ross v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1922] HCA 4,1922-0405 HCA A |
| Date | 1922 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Kelly v R
...258 at 265; Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517; Wright v The Queen (1977) 15 ALR 305. In fact, the danger was recognised earlier: Ross v The King (1922) 30 CLR 246; McKay v The King (1935) 54 CLR 1; Stuart v The Queen (1959) 101 CLR 1; cf Kirby, ‘Controls Over Investigation of Offences......
-
Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission
...reversing findings of fact at first instance, or occasionally, in upholding appeals at all. As late as 1922, for example, Higgins J in Ross v The King176, a criminal appeal, was still resistant to the application, according to its tenor of s 593 of the Crimes Act 1915 (Vic) which allowed ac......
-
James v R
...610; Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158 at 163 per Gibbs CJ, Wilson, Brennan and Deane JJ; [1986] HCA 76. 32Ross v The King (1922) 30 CLR 246 at 254 per Knox CJ, Gavan Duffy and Starke JJ, 274 per Higgins J; [1922] HCA 4; R v Evans [1969] VR 858 at 867–874 per O'Bryan and Little JJ......
- Carr v R
Request a trial to view additional results