Ross v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1979] HCA 29
Year1979
Date1979
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
39 cases
  • K & S Lake City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Bull v R; King v R; Marotta v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 May 2000
    ...382 per McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ. 64 (1998) 194 CLR 355 at 381–382 per McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ. 65Ross v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 432 at 440 per Gibbs 66 See Australian Alliance Assurance Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Q) [1916] St R Qd 135 at 161 per Cooper CJ; Minister fo......
  • Chiropedic Bedding Pty Ltd v Radburg Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Plaintiff M47-2012 v Director General of Security
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 October 2012
    ...500(4)(c). 183 See, for example, Project Blue Sky (1998) 194 CLR 355 at 381–382 [69]–[71]. 184 (1998) 194 CLR 355 at 381–382 [70]. 185Ross v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 432 at 440 per Gibbs J; [1979] HCA 186 See Australian Alliance Assurance Co Ltd v Attorney-General of Queensland [1916] St R......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...see, for example, Bank of NSW v The Commonwealth ('Bank Nationalisation Case') (1948) 76 CLR 1, 184–5 (Latham CJ); Ross v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 432, 440 (Gibbs J); Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v B (2004) 206 ALR 130, 183 [213] (Callinan J). 2005 Terri......
  • PRESERVING THE CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTION OF COURTS AND INCREASING CONFIDENCE IN THE TAX SYSTEM: TIME TO RECONSIDER FUTURIS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 1, August 2019
    • 1 August 2019
    ...(2018) 358 ALR 758, 829-30 [211]-[212] (Bathurst CJ, Ward and Payne JJA) (New South Wales Court of Appeal). (172) Cf Ross v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 432, 440 (Gibbs J, Barwick CJ agreeing at 433, Stephen J agreeing at 442, Mason J agreeing at 442, Aickin J agreeing at (173) Azzi, 'Practical......