Roussel-Uclaf v Pan Laboratories Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1994-0623 FCA B
Year1994
Date1994
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Mitolo Wines Aust Pty Ltd v Vito Mitolo & Son Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 25 July 2019
    ...[2019] FCA 902 Playgro Pty Ltd v Playgo Art & Craft Manufactory Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 478 Roussel Uclaf v Pan Laboratories Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 316 Solarhart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 780; (2011) 282 ALR 43 Streetworx Pty Ltd v Artcraft Urban Group Pty L......
  • Mayne Pharma v Pharmacia Italia SPA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 March 2005
    ... ... It is not anything more than a way of making sure that the injunction is obeyed. Einfeld J in Roussel Uclaf & Another v Pan Laboratories Limited [1994] 51 FCR 316 , in the Federal Court of Australia, on 17th May 1994, dealing with a very similar case, said ... ...
  • Atach v City of Westminster
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 April 2013
    ... ... It is not anything more than a way of making sure that the injunction is obeyed. Einfield J in Rousel Uclaf & Another v Pan Laboratories Limited [1994] 51 FCR 316 , in the Federal Court of Australia, on 17 th May 1994, dealing with a very similar case, said this: ... ...