Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd

Judgment Cited authorities 127 Cited in 209 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron,Hayne JJ,Gummow J,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date06 December 2001
Neutral Citation2001-1206 HCA B,[2001] HCA 68
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS199/2000
Date06 December 2001
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
165 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • The Dispute Resolution Review - British Virgin Islands
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 6 Marzo 2014
    ...11 Goff & Jones, The Law of Unjust enrichment (8th ed.). 12 Roxborough and Others v. Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Limited (2001) 208 CLR 516. 13 BVIHC (COM) 14 BVIHC (COM) 2011/0103. 15 Black Swan Investment ISA v. Harvest View Ltd & Anor BVIHCV 2009/0039 confirming the jurisdict......
  • Recent Developments In The Law Of Unjust Enrichment - Paul Toms And Joseph Gourgey
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 7 Octubre 2021
    ...[72]. The appeal centred on the scope of these exceptions, including the cases of Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68 and Barnes v Eastenders Cash & Carry plc [2014] UKSC 26. However, the present case was held not to fall under any of the exceptions for a simple r......
  • Recent Developments In The Law Of Unjust Enrichment - Paul Toms And Joseph Gourgey
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 7 Octubre 2021
    ...[72]. The appeal centred on the scope of these exceptions, including the cases of Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68 and Barnes v Eastenders Cash & Carry plc [2014] UKSC 26. However, the present case was held not to fall under any of the exceptions for a simple r......
14 books & journal articles
  • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND DISCRETION IN AUSTRALIA: TAKING STOCK.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 3, April 2021
    • 1 Abril 2021
    ...(1) Carty v London Borough of Croydon [2005] 1 WLR 2312, 2319 [25] (Dyson LJ). (2) Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 516, 537-8 [57] (Gummow (3) See, eg, the discussion below in Parts III(B)(1) and IV(C)(3). (4) That is, those who do not have an immediate right......
  • Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment, vols.1-2.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 3, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...[1943] AC 32, 65. (26) See First Restatement, above n 12, [section] 1 comment c. (27) Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 516, 528-9 [24], 529 [27] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron and Hayne JJ), 548 [83], 549-50 [86], 551 [89] (Gummow J) ('Roxborough'); Ben Kremer, 'The Act......
  • Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 Diciembre 2002
    ...is only concerned with the enrichment of the defendant, not the loss of the plaintiff (Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd(2001) 185 ALR 335). 19.40 The Court of Appeal was content to state that the defence is not available in the context of private law claims, incorporating by......
  • UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN AUSTRALIA: WHAT IS(N'T) IT? IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL REASONING AND PRACTICE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 3, April 2020
    • 1 Abril 2020
    ...Law in the High Court of Australia' (2017) 25 (Autumn) Restitution Law Review 121. (5) Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 516, 544-5 [73], 545 [74] (Gummow J) ('Roxborough'), quoted in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89, 156 [151] (G......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT