Royall v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1991] HCA 27,1991-0625 HCA A
Date1991
Year1991
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
71 cases
  • Gillard v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 12 November 2003
    ...(1997) 188 CLR 1 at 44. 28 Such as Markby v The Queen (1978) 140 CLR 108; Johns (TS) v The Queen (1980) 143 CLR 108; Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378; McAuliffe v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 108 and Barlow (1997) 188 CLR 1; cf Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] AC 168; Hui Chi-Ming v The Qu......
  • Baker v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 August 2012
    ...evidence was not admissible in the appellant's favour. The trial judge's direction was correct. The appeal should be dismissed. 1 Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 at 389–390 per Mason CJ, 398 per Brennan J, 410–411 per Deane and Dawson JJ, 423 per Toohey and Gaudron JJ, 441 per McHug......
  • Patel v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 August 2012
    ...v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at 351 [5]; [2008] HCA 16. 30R v Patel; ex parte A-G (Qld) [2011] QCA 81 at [122]. 31Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 at 389, 398, 411–412, 423; [1991] HCA 27; Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316 at 324 [15], 366 [147]; [1998] HCA 75. 32R v Patel; ex p......
  • Burns v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 September 2012
    ...189–192. 17 Campbell v The Queen [1981] WAR 286 at 290 per Burt CJ, Jones and Smith JJ agreeing at 286; approved in Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 at 387 per Mason CJ, 411–412 per Deane and Dawson JJ, 423 per Toohey and Gaudron JJ, 441 per McHugh J; [1991] HCA 18 Unreported, Court of......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Sovereignty, Restraint, & Guidance. Canadian Criminal Law in the 21st Century
    • 25 June 2019
    ...R v Rourke, [1978] 1 SCR 1021 ................................................................................. 521, 522, 523 R v Royall, [1991] HCA 27 ............................................................................................................230 R v Russell, [1933] VLR 59 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT