Royall v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1991] HCA 27,1991-0625 HCA A
Year1991
Date1991

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
74 cases
  • Roncevich v Repatriation Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 August 2005
    ...Ltd v Woodward [1972] AC 824 at 847; March v Stramare (E & M H) Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 at 515, 522–523; Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 at 441; Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare (1992) 176 CLR 408 at 412–413; Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 at 238 [6], 243 [24], 268–269 [9......
  • Burns v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 September 2012
    ...189–192. 17 Campbell v The Queen [1981] WAR 286 at 290 per Burt CJ, Jones and Smith JJ agreeing at 286; approved in Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 at 387 per Mason CJ, 411–412 per Deane and Dawson JJ, 423 per Toohey and Gaudron JJ, 441 per McHugh J; [1991] HCA 18 Unreported, Court of......
  • R v Lavender
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 4 August 2005
    ...12 New South Wales, Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 26 September 1951 at 3223. 13 (1967) 121 CLR 205 at 234. 14 (1990) 172 CLR 378 at 15Royall v The Queen (1990) 172 CLR 378 at 428. 16CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 at 408. 17 (1992)......
  • Baker v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 August 2012
    ...LM's evidence was not admissible in the appellant's favour. The trial judge's direction was correct. The appeal should be dismissed. 1 Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378 at 389–390 per Mason CJ, 398 per Brennan J, 410–411 per Deane and Dawson JJ, 423 per Toohey and Gaudron JJ, 441 per ......
  • Get Started for Free