Ruddock v Vadarlis and Others

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date18 September 2001
Neutral Citation2001-1221 FCA G
Date18 September 2001
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
288 cases
26 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...Bill 2001 (Cth) [6]-[7]. The challenge in the Federal Court had been successful but was reversed by the Full Court: Ruddock v Vadarlis (2001) 110 FCR 491. See also R v Disun (2003) 27 WAR 146, 151 [20] (Anderson J). This legislation was enacted to preclude the possibility of a further appea......
  • Refugees, refoulement, and freedom of movement: asylum seekers' right to admission and territorial asylum
    • United States
    • Georgetown Immigration Law Journal No. 36-1, July 2021
    • 1 July 2021
    ...refugees a right to enter the territory of a Contracting State . . . .”); Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1329, ¶ 203 (Austl.) (asserting, although conclusorily, that the Australian government’s rejection of asylum seekers who had entered Australian ......
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...Housing Authority (1997) 190 CLR 410, 424 (Brennan CJ), 438 (Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ), 455, 459 (McHugh J), 463–4 (Gummow J). 6 (2001) 110 FCR 491, 538. Compare the recent use of the term 'constitutional writs' in preference to 'prerogative writs' to describe the remedies provided for......
  • Democracy, Liberty and the Prerogative: The Displacement of Inherent Executive Power by Statute
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...(1982) 153 CLR 168. 21 Barton v Commonwealth (1974) 131 CLR 477; Oates v A-G (Cth) (2003) 214 CLR 496. 22 Ruddock v Vadarlis (2001) 110 FCR 491. 23 Farey v Burvett (1916) 21 CLR 433, 452. 24 Commonwealth and Central Wool Committee v Colonial Combing, Spinning and Weaving Co Ltd (1922) 31 CL......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT