Rural Press Ltd v Accc;Accc v Rural Press Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Gleeson CJ,Callinan J,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon JJ,Kirby J |
| Judgment Date | 11 December 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] HCA 75,2003-1211 HCA A |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | A197/2003 and A203/2003 |
| Date | 11 December 2003 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
157 cases
- Accc v Tf Woollam & Son Pty Ltd
- Accc v Link Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2)
- Accc v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd
- Accc v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Harper Competition Policy Review Draft Report released: a warning shot to big business?
...effect on competition if that effect could be said to be "meaningful or relevant to the competitive process" (Rural Press v ACCC [2003] HCA 75). To counter the argument that pro-competitive conduct may inadvertently be caught by such an effects-based misuse of market power prohibition, the ......
3 books & journal articles
-
Partial Price-Fixing and Semi-Collusion
...[2003] HCA 45, (2003) 215 C.L.R. 563, [18], [43], [63]–[64],[212]; Rural Press Ltd. v. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75, (2003) 216 C.L.R. 53, [111].492 The Antitrust Bulletin have favored an objective approach.82In Lodge, unfortunately, the Supreme Court decline......
-
'Why can't a woman be more like a man?': American and Australian approaches to exclusionary conduct.
...Melway Publishing (2001) 205 CLR 1, 28 (Glecson CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ). (177) Ibid. (178) Ibid 26 (emphasis added). (179) (2003) 216 CLR 53, 76 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon (180) (2004) 219 CLR 90. For a discussion of the case: see below Part IV(E)(2). (181) (1990) 21 FCR 385. (182......
-
From Foreign Circumstances to First Instance Considerations: Extrinsic Material and the Law of Statutory Interpretation
...84 See, eg, Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53, 87 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ) (with whom Gleeson CJ and Callinan J agreed). My approach here is also consistent with that taken by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Tisand Pt......