Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeWIGNEY J
Judgment Date11 April 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 496
CourtFederal Court
Date11 April 2019
Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496


File number:

NSD 2179 of 2017



Judge:

WIGNEY J



Date of judgment:

11 April 2019



Catchwords:

DEFAMATION – where numerous defamatory imputations alleged – consideration of whether the alleged imputations were conveyed by the publications – consideration of principles of “ordinary reasonable person” and “natural and ordinary” meaning – consideration of whether publications conveyed guilt – consideration of whether publications contained statements as an “antidote” to the “bane” of the defamatory statements – consideration of whether alleged extrinsic facts were matters of general knowledge or notoriety – where defence of justification pleaded by respondents pursuant to s 25 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) – consideration of whether on balance of probabilities the words and “defamatory sting” conveyed by publications were substantially true – where onus of proving pleaded imputations were conveyed by the publications was discharged – where defence of justification failed


Held: application granted – certain defamatory imputations conveyed by the publication – defence of justification not successful


DAMAGES – where applicant sought general compensatory damages for non-economic loss – where applicant sought aggravated damages – assessment of general or compensatory damages – consideration of appropriate and rational relationship between harm sustained by applicant from the publications and the amount of damages – where applicant sought special damages for past economic loss and future economic loss as a result of defamatory publications – consideration of what applicant’s future income would have been but for the defamatory publications – consideration of expert evidence – quantification of damages



Legislation:

Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 4, 8, 25, 29, 30, 34, 35, 35(1), 35(2) and 36

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 44, 69, 102, 135 and 140

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 51A and 52



Cases cited:

Ahmed v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 6

Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158

Andrews v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 225

Arthur Robinson (Grafton) Pty Ltd v Carter (1968) 122 CLR 649

Barrow v Bolt [2013] VSC 226

Baturina v Times Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 308; 1 WLR 1526

Bauer Media Pty Ltd v Wilson (No 2) [2018] VSCA 154

Belbin v Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation [2012] VSC 535

Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336

Bristow v Adams [2012] NSWCA 166

Broome v Cassell & Co Ltd [1972] AC 1027

Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 1091

Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 44

Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Limited (1998)193 CLR 519

Chalmers v Payne (1835) 2 Cr M & R 156 at 159; (1835) 150 ER 67

Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 20 (Dec); EWCA Civ 1772; [2003] EMLR 218

Chau v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 185

Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389

Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227

Coyne v Citizen Finance Limited (1990 – 1991) 172 CLR 211

Crampton v Nugawela (1996) 41 NSWLR 176

Cripps v Vakras [2014] VSC 279

Cross v Queensland Newspapers Pty Limited [2008] NSWCA 80

Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135

Duffy v Google Inc (No 2) [2015] SASC 206

Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd (2005) 221 ALR 186

Fink v Fink (1946) 74 CLR 127

Flegg v Hallett [2015] QSC 167

Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] 2 AC 273 at [8]; 4 All ER 913

Fox v Boulter [2013] EWHC 1435 (QB)

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118

Habib v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2010) 78 NSWLR 619

Haertsch v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 182

Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Tingle [2001] NSWCA 194

Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v Popovic (2003) 9 VR 1

Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2015) 237 FCR 33

Hough v London Express Newspaper, Ltd [1940] 2 KB 507 at 515; [1940] 3 All ER 31

Howden v “Truth” & “Sportsman” Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 416

John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v O’Shane (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 291

John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 77 ALJR 1657; (2003) 201 ALR 77; [2003] HCA 50

Jones v Skelton [1963] 1 WLR 1362; [1963] 3 All ER 952

Lee v Wilson and MacKinnon (1934) 51 CLR 276

Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234

Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384

Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638

March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506

Mastronardo v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2018] NSWCA 136

Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1994-1995) 182 CLR 1

Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Fitzpatrick [1984] 1 NSWLR 643

Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293

Mirror Newspapers Ltd v World Hosts Pty Ltd (1979) 141 CLR 632

Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992)110 ALR 449

Norris v Blake (No 2) (1997) 41 NSWLR 49

O’Brien v McKean (1968) 118 CLR 540

Pahuja v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 893

Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388

Palmer v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 1

Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090

Puels v Exelerate Funding Pty Ltd (2005) 214 ALR 616

R v SAB (2008) 20 VR 55

R v Uhrig (unreported, New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, 24 October 1996)

Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460

Reader’s Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb (1982) 150 CLR 500

Rigby v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1969] 1 NSWR 729

Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 327

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 550

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 4) [2018] FCA 1558

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 6) [2018] FCA 1851

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 357

Sands v South Australia (2015) 122 SASR 195

Selecta Homes and Building Co Pty Ltd v Advertiser-News Weekend Publishing Co Pty Ltd (2001) 79 SASR 451

Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317

Slatyer v The Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co Ltd (1908) 6 CLR 1

Slim v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1968] 2 QB 157

Slipper v British Broadcasting Corporation [1991] QB 283

Société d’Avances Commerciales (Société Anonyme Egyptienne) v Merchants’ Marine Insurance Co (The “Palitana”) (1924) 20 Ll L Rep 140

Speight v Gosnay (1891) 60 LJQB 231

Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537

Ten Group Pty Ltd v Cornes (2012) 114 SASR 46

The Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64

Toomey v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 291

Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497

Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 356 ALR 178

Wagner & Ors v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd & Ors [2018] QSC 201

Waterhouse v Broadcasting Station 2GB Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 58

Wilson v...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 cases
  • Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 2 July 2020
    ...} FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush [2020] FCAFC 115 Appeal from: Rush v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 File number: NSD 679 of 2019 Judges: WHITE, GLEESON AND WHEELAHAN JJ Date of judgment: 2 July 2020 Catchwords: DEFAMATION – appeal from judg......
  • Gold Titan Pty Ltd v Lopez
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 August 2021
    ...[2002] NSWSC 17 Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton [2008] NSWCA 66 Robb v Green [1895] 2 QB 315 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v Campbell Engineering Co Ltd (1948) 65 RPC 203 Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd v Debelak & Ors [1989] FCA 439......
  • Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 25 November 2019
    ...News Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 52; (2003) 216 CLR 327 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 550 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Sands v The State of South Australia (No 2) [2010] SASC 340; (2010) 273 LSJS 424 Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237 Sims v Wran [1984] 1 N......
  • Dutton v Bazzi
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 November 2021
    ...v Lamb [1982] HCA 4; (1982) 150 CLR 500 Rogers v Nationwide News [2003] HCA 52; (2003) 216 CLR 327 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Slim v Daily Telegraph [1968] 2 QB 157 State of New South Wales v IG Index plc [2007] VSCA 212; (2007) 17 VR 87 Stead v Fairfax Media Publi......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Taming the ‘Chilling Effect’ of Defamation Law: English Experience and Implications for Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-2, June 2022
    • 1 June 2022
    ...a broadcaster in defamation for its coverage of him and the allegations (thetruth defence was not made out: Rush v Nationwide News (No 7) [2019] FCA 496), the criminal proceedings f‌iled againstMcLachlan failed (DPP v McLachlan, Magistrates Court of Victoria, 51 December 2020). Rush was awa......
  • Rethinking Richardson: Sexual Harassment Damages in the #MeToo Era
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-2, June 2021
    • 1 June 2021
    ...for the ‘devastating ...hurt to his feelingsoccasioned by allegations of sexual harassment’: Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496, [789],[792].289. Swan v Monash Law Book Co-operative (n 105) [264].290. Elliott v Nanda (2001) 111 FCR 240, [107] (‘Elliott’).291. Ibid [173].29......