Russell v Polites Investments Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Year2012
Date2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Paras v Westpac Banking Corporation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 June 2021
    ...per Gilmour J; Cain v Whyte (1933) 48 CLR 639 … at 646 and 648, the Court agreeing with Henchman J; Russell v Polites Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 11 … at [23] and [24] per Flick J; Rozenbes v Kronhill (1956) 95 CLR 407 at 414 per Dixon CJ and Webb and Fullagar JJ) … Nevertheless, there i......
  • The Owners - Strata Plan No. 20347 v Saha
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 13 August 2021
    ...Ex parte Hempenstall Bros Ltd (No 1) (1929) 1 ABC 54 Rozenbes v Kronhill [1956] HCA 65; 95 CLR 407 Russell v Polites Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 11 Sandell v Porter [1966] HCA 28; 115 CLR 666 Totev v Sfar [2008] FCAFC 35; 167 FCR 193 Trojan v Corporation of Hindmarsh [1987] FCA 276; 16 F......
  • Toyota Finance Australia Limited v Youssef Berro
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 6 May 2022
    ...Wollondilly Shire Council [1980] FCA 66; 30 ALR 266 Rozenbes v Kronhill [1956] HCA 65; 95 CLR 407 Russell v Polites Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 11 Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 88; 252 FCR 267 Totev v Sfar [2008] FCAFC 35; 167 FCR 193 Wolff v Donovan [1991] FCA 222; 29 FCR 480 Di......
  • Li v Wu
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 June 2020
    ...Yu v Todaytech Distribution Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 131 Rigg v Baker [2006] FCAFC 179; 155 FCR 531 Russell v Polites Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 11 Stec v Orfanos [1999] FCA 457 Stratton v Bowles (No 2) [2015] FCA 43 Date of hearing: Determined on the papers Date of last submissions: 13 May 2......
  • Get Started for Free