Russell v Scott
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1936-0812 HCA B,[1936] HCA 34 |
| Year | 1936 |
| Date | 1936 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
76 cases
- Nelson v Nelson
- Drakeford v Cotton and another
-
Pearson v Cayman National Bank Ltd
...3 All E.R. 142, dicta of Denning, M.R. applied. (2) Marshal v. Crutwell(1875), L.R. 20 Eq. 328; 39 J.P. 775. (3) Russell v. ScottUNK(1936), 55 C.L.R. 440; [1936] Aust. L.R. 375, applied. (4) Young v. Sealey, [1949] Ch. 278; [1949] 1 All E.R. 92, applied. Banking-accounts-joint account-trans......
-
Walsh v Walsh
... ... 63 Reliance was placed by Mr. Delaney on the High Court of Australia decision in Russell v. Scott [1936] 55 C.L.R. 440 , and that in Lynch v Burke [1995] 2 I.R. 159 which discussed rebutting the presumption of a result in trust by ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Confiscation Orders: Avoid a ‘Determination’ by ‘Taking a View’: R v Hilton (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 29
...on legal presumptions, the relationship of the joint account holders, and careful investi-gation of mutual intention (Russell v Scott (1936) 55 CLR 440; Drakeford v Cotton [2012] EWHC 1414(Ch)). There is also the additional difficulty that a bank account is a relatively fluid asset, capable......