De Sales v Ingrilli

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron,Gummow,Hayne JJ,McHugh J,Kirby J,Callinan J,Kirby
Judgment Date08 April 2003
Neutral Citation2002-1114 HCA A,[2002] HCA 52,[2003] HCA 16,2003-0408 HCA A
Docket NumberP57/2001
Date08 April 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...how SF in counsel's submission (oral and written) or expert evidence are reflected in judicial reasoning. 108 De Sales v Ingrilli (2002) 212 CLR 338, 405-6 [192] (Callinan J); Cattanach v Melchior (2003) 215 CLR 1, 64 [164] (Kirby J); Neindorf v Junkovic (2005) 222 ALR 631, 634 [9] (Gleeson......
  • Courts and Social Change
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...Jurisprudence of Tolerance: Judicial Review to Lower the Stakes of Identity Politics' (2004) 88 Minnesota Law Review 1021. 16 (2002) 212 CLR 338. 17 Ibid 363 (Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ). 376 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ____________________________________________________________________......
  • Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...CLR 422 (dismissal of arguments presented by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission as an intervenor); De Sales v Ingrilli (2002) 212 CLR 338 (Kirby J considering, but ultimately rejecting, the possible relevance of European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence re: interpretation ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT