Sally Ann Denise Watson v Robin Laurence Trenerry [NTR]

JurisdictionNorthern Territory
JudgeAngel J,Mildren J,Gray A/J
Judgment Date26 May 1998
CourtSupreme Court
Docket NumberFILE NO: AP25 of 1997 and
Date26 May 1998
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Coleman v Power
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • September 1, 2004
    ...348Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 at 576. 349 Relying on Watson v Trenerry (1998) 100 A Crim R 408 at 413; 122 NTR 1 at 350 Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1 at 25–26, 31–34 per Mason CJ, 38, 45–46 per Brennan J, 92 per Gaudron J, 98–105 per Mc......
  • Brokus v Brennan
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • July 18, 2022
    ...CJ. 32 Above n 30 at 12 per Mitchell J, citing Barrington v Austin [1939] SASR 130 at 132 and Rice v Hudson [1940] SASR 290. 33 Ibid. 34 (1998) 122 NTR 1. 35 Ibid at 36 Potentially the interpretation suggested by Ground 1, set out above. 37 Barrington v Austin [1939] SASR 130; Campell v Sam......
  • Robert Inder—Smith v Paul Tudor—Stack
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • September 17, 2004
    ...are political the Court will always treat individual freedom tenderly and beware of selective law enforcement; compare Watson v Trenerry (1998) 122 NTR 1 at 8; Wright v McQualter (1970) 17 FLR 305 at 319–320. In the present case the offending is undoubtedly of a political character. Compare......
  • Amos Ashley v Vivien Lynette Balchin
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • June 1, 2006
    ...behaviour is behaviour which gives offence or which insults. Disorderly conduct is conduct which is disorderly: Watson v Trenerry (1998) 122 NTR 1 at 5. In the case of disorderly behaviour in a public place it is not necessary to prove that the behaviour in fact disturbed the peace or in fa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Protest Before and During a Pandemic
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 50-4, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...13 February 2018) 8.125. Jackson (n 112) [86]–[87].126. See, eg, City of Melbourne v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174, 208–9; Watson v Trenerry(1998) 122 NTR 1, 8; R v Roberts[2019] 1 WLR 2577, 2589 [37].434 Federal Law Review prohibition. Yet,when balancing free speech and assembly against other pu......
  • Protest Before and During a Pandemic
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 50-4, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...13 February 2018) 8.125. Jackson (n 112) [86]–[87].126. See, eg, City of Melbourne v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174, 208–9; Watson v Trenerry(1998) 122 NTR 1, 8; R v Roberts[2019] 1 WLR 2577, 2589 [37].434 Federal Law Review prohibition. Yet,when balancing free speech and assembly against other pu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT