Saraswati v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1991] HCA 21,1991-0605 HCA B
Year1991
Date1991
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
135 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
    • Australia
    • 1 Diciembre 2019
    ...on the understanding that a legislature ordinarily intends to pursue its purposes by coherent means.' See also Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1, 21 (McHugh In many cases, the grammatical or literal meaning of a statutory provision will give effect to the purpose of the legislation. Co......
  • Outside the Text: Inside the use of Extrinsic Materials in Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 Junio 2014
    ...Senator Hill. See Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 30 March 1984, 961 (Senator Robert Hill). 38 See Saraswati v T he Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1, 22–3 where McHugh J summarises the three limbs in the context of the NSW equivalent of s 15AB. 39 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15A......
  • Re Civilian Casualty Court Martial: prosecuting breaches of international humanitarian law using the Australian military justice system.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 37 No. 2, August - August 2013
    • 1 Agosto 2013
    ...(2004) 137 FCR 520, 527 [7] (Black CJ, Wilcox and Gyles JJ). In that sense, the facts were similar to those of Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1. (41) Hoffman (2004) 137 FCR 520, 533 [31]-[37] (Black CJ, Wilcox and Gyles (42) Ibid 534 [40]. See also Jones v Chief of Navy (2012) 205 FCR......
  • THE KIRK STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATION.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 1, August 2020
    • 1 Agosto 2020
    ...C Pearce and Robert S Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (Lexis-Nexis Butterworths, 8th ed, 2014) 328; Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1, 17 (Gaudron J) ('Saraswati'). (159) See Crawford (n 15) 159, 163-9. (160) See Stellios, Zines (n 2) 463-4. See, eg, Union Steamship (n 13......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT