SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd v Smith
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 08 June 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 601 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 08 June 2021 |
SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd v Smith [2021] FCA 601
|
Appeal from: |
|
|
|
|
|
File number: |
QUD 775 of 2019QUD 45 of 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Judgment of: |
RANGIAH J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
8 June 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal against decision of Federal Circuit Court of Australia – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – where employer found to have taken adverse action under s 340 – where employer’s four directors and related company found accessorily liable – whether employee made “complaints or inquiries” under s 341(1)(c)(ii) – whether “complaints or inquiries” a substantial and operative reason for dismissal – where two of four directors gave evidence – challenge to adverse credibility finding based on misapplication of Jones v Dunkel inference – no substantial miscarriage of justice – no retrial – whether penalties manifestly excessive – reduction in penalties against employer and two directors – penalties against related company and two directors set aside – grounds of appeal upheld in part
INDUSTRIAL LAW – penalties – where declarations made that employer failed to pay out annual leave entitlements within a reasonable time under ss 44 and 90(2) – where related company and four directors found accessorily liable – whether penalties manifestly excessive – reduction in penalties against employer and one director – penalties against related company and three directors set aside – grounds of appeal upheld in part
COMPENSATION – quantum – reduction in economic loss to account for vicissitudes – grounds of appeal upheld in part
COSTS – application for extension of time – extension granted – application for leave to appeal against costs orders under s 570 – leave granted – costs orders set aside – no costs – ground of appeal upheld |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 3, 44, 90, 130, 340, 341, 342, 343, 346, 351, 360, 361, 550, 570 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 28(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 25.01(1) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) s 19 Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) s 119A |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345 BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2013) 219 FCR 245 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 64 at 65, 98 ER 969 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (2012) 248 CLR 500 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 50 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clermont Coal Pty Ltd (2015) 253 IR 166; [2015] FCA 1014 Conway v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 203 Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd v Keenan (2020) 302 IR 400; [2020] FCAFC 204 Elliott v Kodak Australasia Pty Ltd (2001) 129 IR 251; [2001] FCA 1804 Fair Work Ombudsman v South Jin Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1456 HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361 National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (2013) 234 IR 139; [2013] FCA 451 PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King (2020) 274 FCR 225 Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2016) 248 FCR 18 R v Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Co Ltd; Ex parte Halliday and Sullivan (1938) 60 CLR 601 Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) (2014) 242 IR 1; [2014] FCA 271 Smith v SBP Employment Solutions (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3318 Smith v SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCCA 3516 Smith v SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd (No 4) [2020] FCCA 61 Todorovic v Waller (1981) 150 CLR 402 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300 Windoval Pty Ltd v Donnelly (2014) 226 FCR 89 |
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
215 |
|
|
|
|
Date of last submissions: |
2 June 2021 (Respondent) |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
9 November 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Appellants: |
Mr C Murdoch QC with Mr S Mackie |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Appellants: |
Carter Newell Lawyers |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent: |
Dr R Haddrick with Mr A Hartnett |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
FCB Workplace Law |
ORDERS
|
|
QUD 775 of 2019 QUD 45 of 2020 |
|
|
|
||
|
BETWEEN: |
SBP EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS PTY LTD First Appellant
SBP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Second Appellant
MAX BURNS (and others named in the Schedule) Third Appellant
|
|
|
AND: |
NICHOLAS SMITH Respondent
|
|
|
order made by: |
RANGIAH J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
8 JUNE 2021 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
-
The parties agree upon and provide to the Court draft orders reflecting the reasons for judgment by 4.30 pm on 15 June 2021.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
|
The Parties |
[7] |
|
The Evidence |
[14] |
|
The Liability and Penalty Decision |
[37] |
|
The Compensation Decision |
[57] |
|
The Costs Decision |
[60] |
|
The Legislation |
[63] |
|
Ground 1: Appeal against findings of contravention of s 340 of the FWA |
[70] |
|
Ground 1(a): Whether the primary judge erred in the application of Jones v Dunkel |
[70] |
|
Whether the error should result in a retrial |
[90] |
|
Ground 1(b): Whether the primary judge erred in finding that “complaints or inquiries” had been made |
[116] |
|
Grounds 1(c) and (d): Whether the primary judge erred in determining reasons for the dismissal |
[151] |
|
Grounds 2 and 3(e): Appeal against penalties |
[158] |
|
Whether Employment Solutions’ penalty for contravention of s 44 of the FWA was manifestly excessive |
[158] |
|
Whether the remainder of the penalties were manifestly excessive |
[171] |
|
Ground 3: Appeal against orders based on findings of accessorial liability |
[177] |
|
Grounds 5 and 6: Appeal against the Compensation Decision |
[193] |
|
Appeal against the Costs Decision |
[205] |
|
Summary |
[214] |
RANGIAH J:
-
The appellants appeal against judgments of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in Smith v SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3318 (the Liability and Penalty...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Alam v National Australia Bank Limited
...Pty Ltd v King [2020] FCAFC 15; (2020) 274 FCR 225 Salama v Sydney Trains [2021] FCA 251 SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd v Smith [2021] FCA 601 Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) [2014] FCA 271, (2014) 242 IR 1 Shea v EnergyAustralia Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 167; (2014) 242 IR 1......
-
Messenger v Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Department of Finance)
...WASC 377 Sabapathy v Jetstar Airways [2021] FCAFC 25 Salama v Sydney Trains [2021] FCA 251 SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd v Smith [2021] FCA 601 Sent v Primelife Corporation Ltd [2006] VSC 445 Serventi v John Holland Group Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1049 Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) (......
-
SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd v Smith (No 2)
...Services Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 810 Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner (2015) 229 FCR 221 SBP Employment Solutions Pty Ltd v Smith [2021] FCA 601 Shea v EnergyAustralia Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 14 Division: Fair Work Division Registry: Queensland National Practice Area: e) Thir......