Seven Network v Cricket Australia
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 27 August 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 1031 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 27 August 2021 |
Seven Network v Cricket Australia [2021] FCA 1031
|
File number: |
VID 764 of 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Judgment of: |
ANASTASSIOU J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
27 August 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – preliminary discovery application pursuant to r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine prospective proceeding – whether there is a matter that arises under federal law or a right, duty or obligation that owes its existence to federal law or depends upon federal law for its enforcement – jurisdiction established
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of three limbs of r 7.23(1) – whether prospective applicant has grounds for reasonable belief in potential right to obtain relief – grounds established – whether prospective applicant has made reasonable inquiries and does not have sufficient information to decide whether to commence proceedings – reasonable inquiries made and insufficient information received – whether prospective respondent has or is likely to have documents that are directly relevant – such documents likely to exist and would assist prospective applicant in making a decision about whether to commence a proceeding – discretionary considerations for refusing relief under r 7.23(2) – relevance of court documents being allegedly leaked to media – orders made for preliminary discovery of documents pending agreement or determination of appropriate categories |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15AC Australian Consumer Law being Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 18 Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth), ss 12, 36, 41C Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 119, 124, 1378 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1A)(c) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 7.23, 7.29 |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited:
|
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Constitution Place Case) [2020] FCA 1070 Australian Solar Mesh Sales Ltd v Anderson [2000] FCA 864; 101 FCR 1 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as The Australian Manufacturing Union (AMWU) v BR & I Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1498 BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v Corelogic Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1556 BHP Billiton Iron Ore v The National Competition Council [2007] FCAFC 157; 162 FCR 234 Bramco Electronics Pty Ltd v ATF Mining Electrics Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 392; 86 NSWLR 115 Burns v Corbett [2018] HCA 15; 265 CLR 304 Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] FCAFC 134; 382 ALR 273 Cromwell Corporation Limited v ARA Real Estate Investors XXI Pte Ltd [2020] FCA 1492 Crosby v Kelly [2012] FCAFC 96; 203 FCR 451 Davidson v Suncorp-Metway Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 1593 Essential Energy v Rose [2020] FCA 722; 145 ACSR 106 Eureka Funds Management Ltd v Freehills Services Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 156; 19 VR 676 Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12; 152 CLR 570 Gold Coast Marine Aquaculture Pty Ltd v HTC Trading Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 684 Hafertepen v Network Ten Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1456 HQ Insurance Pty Limited v Stonehatch Risk Solutions Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 1010, 146 ACSR 159 LNC Industries v BMW (Australia) Ltd [1983] HCA 31; 151 CLR 575 Macteldir Pty Ltd v Dimovski [2005] FCA 1528; 226 ALR 773 Manolo Blahnik Worldwide Limited v Estro Concept Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1561 Minister for Health and Aged Care v Harrington Associates Ltd [1999] FCA 549 Mobil Oil Australia Ltd & McDonalds Australia Ltd v Guina Developments Pty Ltd [1996] 2 VR 34 Nalini Asher Enterprises Pty Ltd v H&M Tracey Construction Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2161 ObjectiVision Pty Ltd v Visionsearch Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1087; 108 IPR 244 Oliver v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 583 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 133; 169 FCR 435 Outback Stores Pty Ltd v Smith [2020] FCA 1785 Paxus Services Ltd v People Bank Pty Ltd [1990] FCA 723; 99 ALR 728 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 193; 257 FCR 62 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1648; 158 IPR 1 Poole v Australian Pacific Touring Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 424 R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett [1945] HCA 50; 70 CLR 141 Reeve v Aqualast Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 679 RNB Equities Pty Ltd v Credit Suisse Investment Services (Australia) Limited [2019] FCA 760, 370 ALR 88 Rush v Commissioner of Police [2006] FCA 12; 150 FCR 165 Shepherd v Felt and Textiles of Australia Ltd [1931] HCA 21; 45 CLR 359 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 1360, 211 ALR 147 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy [2008] FCAFC 7; 166 FCR 64 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509 |
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
185 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
15-16 March 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: |
Mr D. Thomas SC with Mr H. Atkin |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: |
Atanaskovic Hartnell |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Prospective Respondent: |
Mr J. Gleeson QC with Mr A. Dinelli |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Prospective Respondent: |
K&L Gates |
ORDERS
|
|
VID 764 of 2020 |
|
|
|
||
|
BETWEEN: |
SEVEN NETWORK (OPERATIONS) LIMITED (ACN 65 052 845 262) Prospective Applicant
|
|
|
AND: |
CRICKET AUSTRALIA (ACN 53 006 089 130) Prospective Respondent
|
|
|
order made by: |
ANASTASSIOU J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
27 August 2021 |
THE...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Mulley v Hayes
...[2010] FCA 1323 Scott v Secretary, Department of Social Security [2000] FCA 1241; (2000) 65 ALD 79 Seven Network v Cricket Australia [2021] FCA 1031 Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd v Page [2021] NSWCA 204 TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA ......
-
Seven Network v Cricket Australia (No 2)
...ANASTASSIOU J: Introduction These reasons are to be read alongside the background matters set out in Seven Network v Cricket Australia [2021] FCA 1031 at [1]-[35] (the Preliminary Discovery Reasons). For convenience, I adopt the abbreviations and definitions in the Preliminary Discovery Rea......
-
Veolia Water Australia Pty Ltd v Centennial Springvale Pty Limited
...Cases cited: Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 133; (2008) 169 FCR 435 Seven Network v Cricket Australia [2021] FCA 1031 Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: documents directly releva......
-
Seven Network v Cricket Australia (No 3)
...Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37AF Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.32 Cases cited: Seven Network v Cricket Australia [2021] FCA 1031 Seven Network v Cricket Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 1032 Division: General Division Registry: Victoria National Practice Area: the Court, ......