Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judgment Date | 27 May 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 560 |
| Date | 27 May 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Minister for the Environment v Sharma
...re-litigation by the Minister, and by the respondents to the appeal and those whom they represent: Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560; 391 ALR 1 (PJ) at [515]; SJ [11], [18]; Carnie v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd [1995] HCA 9; 182 CLR 398 at 423-424 (Toohey and Gaudron J......
-
O'Donnell v Commonwealth of Australia
...and injunctions in relation to the conditions of detention in the relevant centres; and (b) Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560, in which eight Australian children, on their own behalf and on behalf of children who ordinarily reside in Australia, brought a r 9.21(1) represe......
-
Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment (No 2)
...Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 158 Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560 Stuart v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2010) 185 FCR 308 Zhang v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs ......
16 firm's commentaries
-
Sharma appeal decision: end of the road for novel duty of care?
...of greenhouse gas emissions management and abatement. The effect of the first instance decision in Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560 was that the Commonwealth Minister needed to take into account the Court's findings on the human health impacts of climate change and the d......
-
Cross-border investment and the environment: friends or foes?
...heritage and sacred sites. This follows the 2021 decision of the Australian Federal Court in Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560. In that case, the Court found that the Minister for the Environment had a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing personal injury to child......
-
Cross-border investment and the environment: friends or foes?
...heritage and sacred sites. This follows the 2021 decision of the Australian Federal Court in Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560. In that case, the Court found that the Minister for the Environment had a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing personal injury to child......
-
Australian Court Rules Environmental Regulator Is Duty Bound To Develop Climate Change Policies
...storage technology. The BSCA decision also follows the recent decision of the Federal Court in Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560 in which the Court ruled that, in determining whether to approve a coal mine development, the Federal Minister for the Environment owed a duty ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Case for Eco-Liability: Post Okpabi Justifications for the Imposition of Liability on Parent Companies for Damage caused to the Environment by their Subsidiaries
...and Others v Royal Dutch Shell plc [2021] Hague District Court C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19-379 and Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560. 3 [2021] UKSC 3. 4 Brian Hutchinson, Keane on Company Law (5th edn, Bloomsbury Professional 2016) 5. 5 E.A. French, ‘The Origin of General Limi......