Sidhu v Van Dyke

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,,Kiefel,Bell,Keane JJ
Judgment Date16 May 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] HCA 19
Docket NumberS312/2013
CourtHigh Court
Date16 May 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
124 cases
  • Guest and another v Guest
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 October 2022
    ...was that an essentially expectation-based monetary award was upheld. 59 To much the same effect was the decision of the High Court in Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19; 251 CLR 505. The claimant sought the transfer to her of a cottage which had been promised to her by the defendant on the fai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Inside track: Property & Real Estate - In the media and recent cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 December 2019
    ...ESTOPPEL - whether the defendant is estopped from denying the plaintiff's joint beneficial interest the property - Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19; (2014) 251 CLR 505 LIMITATIONS - whether the plaintiff is estopped from contending that he has an interest in the property, or is otherwise barr......
  • Inside Track: Property & Real Estate - In the media and cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 14 August 2020
    ...(1985) 160 CLR 583; Baumgartner v Baumgartner [1985] HCA 78; (1985) 160 CLR 583; Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101; Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19; (2014) 251 CLR 505 Donis Donis [2007] VSCA 89; (2007) 19 VR 577 referred to ESTOPPEL - former adjudication - whether summary order for rec......
4 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...53, further discussed by Sir Owen Dixon himself in ‘Concerning Judicial Method’ in Woinarski (ed), Jesting Pilate (1965) 152, 164. 104 (2014) 251 CLR 505, [79]-[86], [90]-[92]; [2014] HCA 19. 105 (2014) 253 CLR 560, [85]-[87], [149]-[151]; [2014] HCA 14. 106 [2016] HCA 26, [139]-[141]. 107 ......
  • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND DISCRETION IN AUSTRALIA: TAKING STOCK.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 3, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...(2009) 2 ASTLR 336 ('Australian Building & Technical Solutions'); Van Dyke v Sidhu (2013) 301 ALR 769, affd Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505 ('Sidhu'); Grant v Roberts [2019] NSWSC (110) Liew, 'Proprietary Estoppel in Australia' (n 105) 286-7. (111) See generally ibid 292-306. (112) ......
  • Consumer Redress Legislation: Simplifying or Subverting the Law of Contract
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 80-5, September 2017
    • 1 September 2017
    ...Co Ltd (in liq) vTexas CommerceInternational Bank Ltd [1982] QB 84, 104-105 per Robert Goff J, affirmed on appeal; Sidhu vVan D y k e [2014] HCA 19, (2014) 251 CLR 505 at [71] – [74] per French CJ, Kiefel, Bell andKeane JJ.85 Henville vWal k er n50above.86 n 59 above at [26]-[40].87 Australi......
  • THE CASE AGAINST THE EQUITABLE LIEN.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 3, August 2019
    • 1 April 2019
    ...J); Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394, 416 (Mason CJ), 429-30 (Brennan J), 439 (Deane J). (193) See, eg, Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505, 527 [77], 530 [85] (French CJ, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ) ('Sidhu'); Donis v Donis (2007) 19 VR 577, 582-3 [18]-[19] (Nettle JA) ('Donis'). ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT