Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v ACCC
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] FCAFC 20,2012-0307 FCA B |
| Year | 2012 |
| Date | 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
153 cases
-
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
...21; 206 CLR 267 Silvano v R [2008] NSWCCA 118; 184 A Crim R 593 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19; 168 A Crim R 249 Tsang v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2011] VSCA 336; 35 VR 240 Tyler v R [2......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies)
...Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; 216 CLR 53 Singtel Optus v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Spectrum Stores Inc v Citgo Petroleum 632 F3d 935 (5th Cir 2011) Tax Practitioners Board v Su [2014] FCA 731 Trade Practices C......
-
Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
...HCA 21; 206 CLR 267 Scott v Davis [2000] HCA 52; 204 CLR 333 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Stokes v The Queen [2020] SASCFC 9 Sultan v Svikart (1989) 96 FLR 457; 42 A Crim R 15 Tabbah v......
- ACCC v Excite Mobile Pty Ltd (No 2)
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Price of Contravening the Australian Consumer Law: An overview of ACCC litigation in 2012 and what to expect in 2013
...be on competition cases.13 Footnotes 1 Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA). 2 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v ACCC [2012] FCAFC 20. A penalty of $5.26 million was initially imposed, although this was reduced to $3.61 million on appeal. 3 ACCC v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2......
-
High Court decides maximum civil penalties are not just for the worst conduct
...at [46] 5 Bendigo Theatre Case [No 2] [2018] FCA 1211 at [20] 6 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 at 7 ABCC v Pattinson at [60] 8 ABCC v Pattinson at [53], referring to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (A......