Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2004-1206 FCA A,[2004] FCAFC 321 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Year | 2004 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
- Kapitany v Commonwealth of Australia
-
Abu-Amsha v Wagner
...South Wales Ltd (1996) 71 FCR 58 Silvas (a bankrupt) v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1997] FCA 206 Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 321; (2004) 141 FCR 107 Soong v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] NSWCA 26; (2011) 278 ALR 538 Thompson v Metham [1999] FCA 935 Date of h......
-
Burrows v Macpherson and Kelley Lawyers (Sydney) Pty Ltd
...[1988] FCA 490; (1988) 19 FCR 347 Shephard v Chiquita Brands South Pacific Limited [2004] FCAFC 76 Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 321; (2004) 141 FCR 107 SZKNX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 67 SZOBI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] F......
-
Quinn v O'Rourke, in the matter of O'Rourke (No 2)
...it must be said that it probably does not fully explain the meaning of the expression. [65] In Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 321; (2004) 141 FCR 107, the Full Court cited with apparent approval the observations made by Tamberlin J to which I have referred at [64] above. Th......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Can you still serve a bankruptcy notice by email?
...of the post. Fancourt was followed in relation to a bankruptcy notice and regulation 16.01(2) in Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 321 where Sundberg, Finkelstein & Hely JJ If, on the proper construction of reg 16.01(2), the words "proof to the contrary" permit proof that the ......