Skelton v Collins

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1966] HCA 14,1966-0307 HCA B
Date1966
Year1966
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
65 cases
  • Tan Kok Lam (next friend to Teng Eng) v Hong Choon Peng
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 April 2001
    ... ... I cannot read Benham v Gambling as having by implication intended such a result (p 369) ... By contrast, in Skelton v Collins [1965] 105 CLR 94, the Australian High Court, by a majority of 4-1, departed from the majority decision in West v Shephard (supra) and ... ...
  • Fitch v Hyde-Cates
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • R Ats. Thorpe v Molyneaux
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 31 January 1979
    ... ... High Court has subsequently refused to follow some English Court of Appeal decisions on the measure of damages in personal injury cases in Skelton v. Collins (1965-6) 115 C.L.R. 94 and the dicta in that case of Kitto, J. at p. 104 and Windeyer, J. at p. 133, 136 are highly instructive. The ... ...
  • Singh v Persaud
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • 14 February 1985
    ... ... Phillips v. South-Western Railway Company and the Australian case, Skelton v. Collins [1966] 115 C.L.R. 94 were applied ... 49 That was the direction in which the current of authority flowed ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • The Development of the High Court's Willingness to Overrule Common Law Precedent
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...see Toohey, above n 8, 191–2; Sir Anthony Mason, ‘The Common Law in Final Courts of Appeal outside Britain’, above n 8, 187–9. 60 (1966) 115 CLR 94. 61 [1964] AC 326. 62 (1966) 117 CLR 118. 63 Whitfeld v De Lauret & Co Ltd (1920) 29 CLR 71; Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v McGregor (1928) 41 C......
  • The Australian Constitution's Influence on the Common Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-1, March 2003
    • 1 March 2003
    ...454 (Higgins J). See also R v Snow (1915) 20 CLR 315, 325 (Griffith CJ); R vSharkey (1949) 79 CLR 121, 163 (Webb J); Skelton v Collins (1966) 115 CLR 94, 134–5(Windeyer J); Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 367, 370 (Walsh J during argument). See alsothe discussion in Lipohar (1999) 200 CLR ......
  • The Common Law in Australia: Its Nature and Constitutional Significance
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-3, September 2004
    • 1 September 2004
    ...considered by the House of Lords or the Privy Council. 34 Piro v Foster (1943) 68 CLR 313. 35 (1963) 111 CLR 610. 36 Skelton v Collins (1966) 115 CLR 94. 344 Federal Law Review Volume 32 ____________________________________________________________________________________ From then on the or......
  • The Common Law in Australia: Its Nature and Constitutional Significance
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-3, September 2004
    • 1 September 2004
    ...considered by the House of Lords or the Privy Council. 34 Piro v Foster (1943) 68 CLR 313. 35 (1963) 111 CLR 610. 36 Skelton v Collins (1966) 115 CLR 94. 344 Federal Law Review Volume 32 ____________________________________________________________________________________ From then on the or......
  • Get Started for Free